Apos x Community Rock Lobster VS Sivga M300

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Apos x Community Rock Lobster and Sivga M300 are in-ear monitors. Apos x Community Rock Lobster costs $60 while Sivga M300 costs $65. Sivga M300 is $5 more expensive. Sivga M300 holds a slight 0.3-point edge in reviewer scores (6.3 vs 6.6). Sivga M300 has better mids with a 0.8-point edge, Sivga M300 has significantly better treble with a 1.7-point edge, Apos x Community Rock Lobster has better dynamics with a 0.8-point edge and Sivga M300 has better soundstage with a 0.7-point edge.

Insights

Metric Apos x Community Rock Lobster Sivga M300
Bass 6.3 6.1
Mids 6 6.8
Treble 5 6.7
Details 6.3 6.5
Soundstage 6.4 7.1
Imaging 6.3 6.4
Dynamics 7 6.2
Tonality 6.1 6.8
Technicalities 5 6.5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Apos x Community Rock Lobster and Sivga M300 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Apos x Community Rock Lobster Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive


Sivga M300 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.6

Cautiously Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Apos x Community Rock Lobster (more reviews)

Apos x Community Rock Lobster reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
Has some slight colorizations, but is fun and rich.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B

Apos x Community Rock Lobster reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 5.5 * score rescaled + normalized

Sivga M300 (more reviews)

Sivga M300 reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 6.6 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
B+ Tuning
B+ Tech
Neutral-leaning flathead earbud with clear vocals and airy treble; sub-bass is light and benefits from a warmer source or a touch of EQ. Airy treble, open stage and clear vocals with tasteful neutral bass; handsome ebony-wood build. Limited sub-bass presence and body; may rely on volume, warmer sources or EQ to add weight to the low end.
Youtube Video Summary

The M300 is a flathead earbud in ebony wood shells with a 15.4 mm dynamic driver; in hand it feels solid and well finished. Tuning leans neutral with a flatter low end that supports the lower mids, lifts vocal energy modestly, and carries into an airy treble with good extension, yielding a natural sense of stage. The presentation emphasizes clarity and openness rather than warmth or heavy slam.

Bass focuses on mid-bass texture and impact more than sub-bass rumble, with some roll-off; turning volume up or pairing with a warmer source/EQ adds body if desired. Mids come forward cleanly with balanced male and female vocals, while the upper range stays extended without sounding peaky, contributing to stage height and resolving power. A light lift to sub-bass can yield a fuller balance without masking the well-extended top end, but even stock the M300 delivers a tasteful, open and controlled listen for an earbud form factor.

Bass: B- Mids: B+ Treble: A- Soundstage: B+ Details: B+

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

Sivga M300 reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 6.6 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech

Although often grouped with IEMs in shops, the Sivga M300 is a flat-head earbud with an open fit. It combines CNC-machined aluminum and African ebony housings around a 15.4 mm dynamic driver (graphene-coated diaphragm). .

Key specs include 64 Ω impedance, 109 dB sensitivity, a rated 20 Hz–40 kHz response, and a fixed silver-plated OFC cable; weight is listed at 29 g. Street pricing sits around $64.90, placing it firmly in the budget segment. .

On performance, product descriptions and early impressions point to a warm-balanced tilt with punchy bass, clear vocals, and a notably wide, airy stage for the price—consistent with the open earbud form factor (with limited isolation and bass depth depending on foams/fit). An independent write-up also highlights build quality, comfort, and surprisingly cohesive sound at this price point.


Bass: B Mids: B+ Treble: B Dynamics: B Soundstage: A- Details: B Imaging: B

Apos x Community Rock Lobster User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Sivga M300 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Apos x Community Rock Lobster Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

Sivga M300 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.5

Gaming Grade

B+

Apos x Community Rock Lobster Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Mids B
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics A-
The system snaps into action with precision, highlighting every swell. Recordings feel energetic and alive.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Sivga M300 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass B
Low end hits with respectable impact while staying reasonably tidy. You get a healthy sense of rhythm.
Mids B+
The region sounds composed and expressive, giving vocals a natural spotlight. It keeps vocals front and center nicely.
Treble B+
Treble response is good, delivering clarity and sparkle without fatigue. Hi-hats sound lively without sting.
Dynamics B
The performance feels robust, with satisfying punch and natural transitions. Nuances are easy to follow.
Soundstage A-
Immersion steps up dramatically as width, depth, and height integrate into a cohesive hologram. Everything sounds naturally spaced.
Details B+
You hear inner textures easily, even when the arrangement piles on layers. You can hear subtle studio effects.
Imaging B
Layered vocals and harmonies remain distinct and easy to track. Layered vocals remain easy to track.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.

Apos x Community Rock Lobster User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Sivga M300 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer