Subtonic STORM VS Aful Dawn-X

Most IEMs inevitably introduce flaws that shatter musical immersion—be it harsh treble, shouty vocals, or unbalanced bass. These imperfections act as chains, binding the listener and preventing that elusive state of pure, uninterrupted freedom within the music. While the OG EJ07 came close, even it faltered on certain tracks, its forward vocals becoming a jarring distraction when pushed hard. The Subtonic Storm, however, shatters this pattern entirely.

Contrary to its name, the Storm represents the eye of the hurricane—a sanctuary of pure, effortless sound. It liberates the music from tuning flaws, presenting it naturally and tranquilly. There are zero distractions or attachments holding the listener back, enabling deep introspection and complete immersion, as if conversing directly with the singer or instrument. This profound, intangible quality—achieving that free state—is why it's considered the best IEM, offering unmatched resolution, separation, and imaging, albeit at an astronomical $5,000 price point.

Value-wise, the Storm is undeniably terrible; the KZ ASF ($250) gets you 80% there, and the Monarch MKII ($1,000) delivers 95%. It's a luxury item, justified only by its unique, unmeasurable ability to dissolve worldly distractions and forge total oneness with the music. Crucially, it's not for everyone: Bass heads, background listeners, or those enjoying J-pop/K-pop/EDM will find far better value elsewhere under $300. Only those deeply seeking musical transcendence, with ample disposable income, should even consider it. For everyone else, stay away—you simply don’t need it.

Jays Audio original ranking

Subtonic STORM closes the list as the ultra-high-end, “one-and-done” pick—the kind of most expensive flagship that needs no hype because the name says it all. Chosen for a “versatile” roundup, it’s framed as the endgame option for those who want a single IEM to cover everything and have the budget to match—cue the playful “rich boys” jab.

The verdict is equal parts praise and pragmatism: demo first. STORM isn’t a blind-buy, and the price is so stratospheric it gets the tongue-in-cheek advice to sell a car, a house, or a kidney. In short, a summit-fi statement piece with serious one-set potential—but only after making sure the tuning truly clicks.

Tim Tuned original ranking

Subtonic STORM lands as a $5,200 flagship built around novel SLAM balanced-armature tech: the dual BA “subwoofer” and “woofer” are separated and crossed over independently, joined by a regular BA mid-woofer, additional BA mids, BA mid-tweeter and tweeter, plus two EST—nine drivers total with a seven-point crossover. The result isn’t just another spec sheet; it’s a system that behaves like a rethought low-end engine that sets up everything above it.

On music, the bass ranks an honest 8/10 because it doesn’t sound like typical BA bass—there’s real weight without mid bleed, so male/female vocals, strings, and guitars stay pristine. Complex tracks reveal studio fingerprints: the 38 Hz triple drop on Big Boi’s “Kill Jill” slams; the glockenspiel in Springsteen’s “Born to Run” is crystal; Pink Floyd’s “On the Run” left-right sweeps and the early gate announcement snap into focus; Hendrix’s uneven production becomes obvious; and the Led Zeppelin IV kick-drum intro hits with the produced, swirling authority it should. From Vivaldi to hip-hop, it just handles the library.

Stage is spacious and speaker-like off good sources, with positional cues that outclass sets like Elysian Annihilator and even edge the Fatfreq Grand Maestro for resolution, stage, and tonality—though Grand Maestro’s multi-tuning keeps it competitive. Ignore treble “hacksaw” graph takes and target-chasing; the performance argues against strict adherence to Harman-style curves. Diminishing returns are real, but for those chasing something genuinely different, the STORM’s reworked BA low end and refined EST top end deliver a uniquely authoritative, all-genre presentation that’s hard to unhear.

URL to full Review

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Large, sculpted shells with a bulbous rear (housing the bone conductor) make the Aful Dawn-X a substantial fit—comfortable for some, but risky for small ears. The stock cable feels quality but is 4.4 mm-only, and the case/accessories are tidy; importantly, the nozzle grips tips securely (unlike some past AFUL sets). Overall build is handsome and premium, with fit being the main variable.

Sonically, the tuning favors sub-bass over mid-bass, pairs rich mids with smooth, natural treble that avoids harsh spikes yet has mild 4–6 kHz energy, and presents a cohesive, almost speaker-like soundstage. It wakes up with a bit of volume/power, prioritizing clarity, micro-detail and air over outright slam; the bone conductor subtly supports the midrange more than the lows. At $1,300 it’s competitive for listeners chasing technical refinement and a natural tonality, while value seekers or mid-bass lovers may prefer cheaper AFUL options or sets with more punch.

Jaytiss original ranking

AFUL’s house sound shows up here in its most polished form: Dawn-X is a tribrid (1DD + 8BA + 4EST + bone conduction) flagship at $1,300 that prioritizes consistent fit and execution over flash. Build is understated with stabilized-wood faceplates, above-average isolation, and a medium/medium-large shell that fits better—and more consistently—than the Cantor. The accessory loadout is solid (four silicone tip sets, large but well-made case), though the stock cable does not have swappable terminations (choose 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm).

Tonally, it’s a balanced, warmer-leaning take on AFUL’s signature: a dense, controlled bass that borders on decadent yet stays quick and clean, slightly relaxed mids, and a precise, mildly forward lower-treble that keeps definition high without tipping into harshness for most listeners. Stage favors front-to-back depth over width; transients are clean and a touch clinical, giving strong separation without sounding smeary. The result is a mature, confident presentation that reads refined rather than showy.

Against peers: versus Cantor, Dawn-X is warmer, smoother, and far more consistent thanks to fit; Cantor can sound brighter and a bit wider. Compared with FiiO FX17, Dawn-X has tighter bass and crisper treble, where FX17 feels looser and fuller. The 64 Audio U4s plays softer and wider; Dawn-X is more precise/clinical. DUNU Glacier hits harder and more V-shaped with smoother treble but less natural acoustic timbre; Dawn-X sounds truer on instruments. Versus ThieAudio Monarch MK4, MK4 is more neutral, vocal-forward with greater width, while Dawn-X offers denser low-end and a calmer demeanor—and a friendlier fit for many ears. Verdict: 3/5 stars—not the flashiest in its bracket, but arguably AFUL’s best execution yet of its signature sound.

Super* Review original ranking