Symphonium Audio Aurora VS FATfreq x HBB Deuce

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Symphonium Audio Aurora and FATfreq x HBB Deuce use 2BA and 2DD driver setups respectively. Symphonium Audio Aurora costs $220 while FATfreq x HBB Deuce costs $239. FATfreq x HBB Deuce is $19 more expensive. FATfreq x HBB Deuce holds a decisive 2.7-point edge in reviewer scores (4.5 vs 7.2).

Insights

Metric Symphonium Audio Aurora FATfreq x HBB Deuce
Bass 4.5 7
Mids 4.5 7
Treble 4.5 5.5
Soundstage 4.5 6
Dynamics 4.5 6
Tonality 5 6.6
Technicalities 4.5 5.8

Symphonium Audio Aurora Aggregated Review Score

Symphonium Audio Aurora Average Reviewer Scores

Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable


FATfreq x HBB Deuce Aggregated Review Score

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Jays Audio
Drew / Audionotions Bad Guy Good Audio Z-Reviews
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7.2

Generally Favorable


Symphonium Audio Aurora User Review Score

Symphonium Audio Aurora Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Review Score

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Symphonium Audio Aurora Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.7

Gaming Grade

C

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

Symphonium Audio Aurora Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

Symphonium Audio Aurora Reviews

Symphonium Audio Aurora reviewed by:

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C Tech
Solid tuning, though average in technicalities.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Reviews

FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by:

Super* Review 8.5* * score normalized
This is not my usual sound signature which I like. But it's a lot of fun in a unique way. One-trick pony.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
- Super* Review

FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by:

Drew / Audionotions 7.5 Reviewer Score
Easy reccomendation for somoene looking for a basshead IEM that still retains some resemblence of neutrality through the mids and treble. Loaner

Drew / Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

- Drew / Audionotions

FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by:

Bad Guy Good Audio 7.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
check links for more info:

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
- Bad Guy Good Audio
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: B

FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by:

Z-Reviews 7 * score normalized

FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by:

Jaytiss 6.8 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
Hits Hard, and is super fun. Suprisingly great mids.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: B

FATfreq x HBB Deuce reviewed by:

Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
B+ Tech
The defacto basshead rec before the more expensive stuff. Super fun sub-bass, textured, heavy, prolonged decay for more reverb in the bass, well-balanced as well, smooth and scales great. Tech is not its strong point, and DON'T buy from FatFreq directly!!!

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

Symphonium Audio Aurora User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer