TANGZU X SeeAudio VS Apos x Community Rock Lobster

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs
My Ranking My Favorites

TANGZU X SeeAudio and Apos x Community Rock Lobster are in-ear monitors. TANGZU X SeeAudio costs $50 while Apos x Community Rock Lobster costs $60. Apos x Community Rock Lobster is $10 more expensive. Apos x Community Rock Lobster holds a decisive 3.8-point edge in reviewer scores (2.5 vs 6.3). Apos x Community Rock Lobster has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Apos x Community Rock Lobster has significantly better treble with a 4-point edge, Apos x Community Rock Lobster has significantly better dynamics with a 6-point edge and Apos x Community Rock Lobster has significantly better soundstage with a 2.4-point edge.

Insights

Metric TANGZU X SeeAudio Apos x Community Rock Lobster
Mids 4 6
Treble 1 5
Soundstage 4 6.4
Dynamics 1 7
Tonality 2.5 6.1
Technicalities 1 5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough TANGZU X SeeAudio and Apos x Community Rock Lobster reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

TANGZU X SeeAudio Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

2.5

Very Negative

Apos x Community Rock Lobster Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive

Reviews Comparison

TANGZU X SeeAudio reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 2.5 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
E- Tech
Very Bland. A bit warm, but not terible.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: C-

Apos x Community Rock Lobster reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-10-11
Jaytiss 7.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
Has some slight colorizations, but is fun and rich.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B
YouTube video thumbnail

Apos x Community Rock Lobster (more reviews)

Apos x Community Rock Lobster reviewed by Z-Reviews

2025-10-13
Z-Reviews 5.5 * score rescaled + normalized
check links for more info:

Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

TANGZU X SeeAudio User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Apos x Community Rock Lobster User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

TANGZU X SeeAudio Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.5

Gaming Grade

E

Apos x Community Rock Lobster Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

TANGZU X SeeAudio Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D-
  • Balance is severely off, producing a harsh, unpleasant listen regardless of genre. Long sessions quickly become exhausting.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • The presentation is claustrophobic and blurred, leaving simple arrangements sounding chaotic and lifeless. The presentation feels more like background noise than music.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable yet unrefined, revealing grain and occasional harshness. It sounds a bit grainy on detailed recordings.
Treble E-
Expect severely attenuated treble that leaves textures subdued. Everything sounds veiled and muted.
Dynamics E-
It cannot muster meaningful volume gradation, making tracks feel static. It drains life from energetic music.
Soundstage C-
Stereo spread is acceptable, yet the image resembles a stage set without depth behind the curtain. Depth feels more like a gentle slope.
Gaming E
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Apos x Community Rock Lobster Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Mids B
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics A-
The system snaps into action with precision, highlighting every swell. Recordings feel energetic and alive.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

TANGZU X SeeAudio User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Apos x Community Rock Lobster User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer