Thieaudio Valhalla VS AFUL Dawn-X

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Thieaudio Valhalla and AFUL Dawn-X use 19BA and 1DD+8BA+4EST+1BC driver setups respectively. Thieaudio Valhalla costs $2,000 while AFUL Dawn-X costs $1,299. Thieaudio Valhalla is $701 more expensive. Thieaudio Valhalla holds a slight 0.2-point edge in reviewer scores (8.9 vs 8.7). AFUL Dawn-X has slightly better mids with a 0.4-point edge, AFUL Dawn-X has significantly better treble with a 1.2-point edge, Thieaudio Valhalla has better dynamics with a 0.5-point edge and Thieaudio Valhalla has better imaging with a 0.8-point edge.

Insights

Metric Thieaudio Valhalla AFUL Dawn-X
Bass 8.3 8.5
Mids 8.1 8.5
Treble 7.8 8.9
Details 8.5 8.5
Soundstage 8.5 8.5
Imaging 8.8 8
Dynamics 8 7.5
Tonality 8.5 8.8
Technicalities 8.4 9.2

Thieaudio Valhalla Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.9

Excellent


AFUL Dawn-X Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.7

Excellent


Reviews Comparison

Thieaudio Valhalla reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 9.6 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech
Big fan, but lacks fantastic air like some other sets.
Youtube Video Summary

Thieaudio Valhalla lands as a 19-BA flagship around $2,000 that doubles down on build and ergonomics. The titanium shell is chunky but beautifully machined, skin-friendly, and the nozzle grips tips securely; faceplates are swappable for a premium if the stock look isn’t it. Accessories are basic—tips, foams, brush, the usual case—and the stock cable is comfy with a working chin slider, but the modular 3.5/4.4 plugs don’t lock and can pop off too easily. The slightly recessed 2-pin is fine, yet the ear-side barrel leaves a small gap that doesn’t sit flush; a simple aftermarket cable fixes the vibe. Taken as an object, this is world-class industrial design with a couple cable quirks.

On the ear, Valhalla hits a clean, incisive neutrality with just enough flavor. Sub-bass is surprisingly firm for BA, mid-bass stays tidy, and the mids are pristine—no glaze, no haze. There’s a tasteful dip through ~3–6 kHz that keeps the upper-mids from shouting, while a touch of 8 kHz sparkle adds air; treble extends smoothly without turning edgy. It’s a highly technical, high-resolution listen that can read “almost boring” if a colored signature is the goal—but for detail, separation, and coherence, it delivers. Unit variation appears minor (another sample showed a bit more 4–6 k energy), yet the core tuning stays intact.

Versus housemates: Origin swings bassier and “fun”; Valhalla feels cleaner, clearer, more resolute. Hype 2/4 don’t match the air and microdetail; Hype 10 gets closer up top but raises value questions. Oracle MK3 has more 4–5 k zing and lighter sub-bass; Fatfreq Grand Maestro hits similarly rich lows but brings fit hassles and module faff. Against the Elysian Annihilator, pick Annihilator for extra sub-bass and spectacle; pick Valhalla for comfort, longevity, and easy cable-swapping. Not perfect—the stock cable system is flimsy and the “air” isn’t the most crystalline—but this is a top-tier contender with a refined, broadly pleasing tuning and a shell that feels built to outlast the hype.

Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: S

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Thieaudio Valhalla or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $1,999

Buy Thieaudio Valhalla on Linsoul

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 9.6 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
This has a really natural midrange, best BC iem I've heard by far.
Youtube Video Summary

Large, sculpted shells with a bulbous rear (housing the bone conductor) make the Aful Dawn-X a substantial fit—comfortable for some, but risky for small ears. The stock cable feels quality but is 4.4 mm-only, and the case/accessories are tidy; importantly, the nozzle grips tips securely (unlike some past AFUL sets). Overall build is handsome and premium, with fit being the main variable.

Sonically, the tuning favors sub-bass over mid-bass, pairs rich mids with smooth, natural treble that avoids harsh spikes yet has mild 4–6 kHz energy, and presents a cohesive, almost speaker-like soundstage. It wakes up with a bit of volume/power, prioritizing clarity, micro-detail and air over outright slam; the bone conductor subtly supports the midrange more than the lows. At $1,300 it’s competitive for listeners chasing technical refinement and a natural tonality, while value seekers or mid-bass lovers may prefer cheaper AFUL options or sets with more punch.

Mids: S Treble: S Dynamics: A- Soundstage: S

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your AFUL Dawn-X or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $1,299

Buy AFUL Dawn-X on HiFiGO

Thieaudio Valhalla reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 9.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
TOTL all-rounder with "endgame" tech across the board, a better tuned U12T with better bass texture
Youtube Video Summary

Thieaudio Valhalla lands as an “endgame” all-rounder with standout resolution, micro-detail, and imaging. Layering and separation are locked in, with vocals that aren’t scooped—mids stay present and natural. Sub-bass hits rumblier than the U12t and the treble avoids that sudden, sharp peak, making the overall presentation smoother yet still airy. Versus the Cadenza 12, Valhalla is less treble-heavy, a touch bassier, and not as bright-leaning; the Cadenza 12 may edge it on micro-detail by only a few percentage points, so it’s a straight tuning preference: go Cadenza 12 for leaner/brighter sparkle, go Valhalla for the better-balanced bassy all-rounder.

On value, this isn’t twice the performance of a Monarch Mk II/Mk III—think ~10% better with clear diminishing returns. For the “chase the very best” crowd, it’s absolutely worth a listen; for most, Monarchs/LTD/Crimson are already more than enough for a so-called endgame. Final call: Top Tier for tuning and sound refinement—not a value pick, but a legit endgame-grade set.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S- Tech
Smooth treble, natural timbre, good sub-bass focused set, but transients can be a bit soft, and vocals are pulled back lacking final extension - non-fatiguing but not very engaging and "dynamic". A bassier 5+2 with smoother/more natural treble. Reminds me of the Luna but less mid-bass/vocals, more sub, and a little smoother. Bassy all-rounder like MK4 bass switch but with pulled back vocals, and less versatile since no switch option.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Thieaudio Valhalla reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 9* * score rescaled + normalized
I'm really tempted to go out and buy one of this things for myself - if it fit me even better, I probably would.
Youtube Video Summary

Thieaudio’s Valhalla is a $2,000, all–balanced armature flagship packing 19 balanced armatures in new-for-the-brand metal shells. The look leans understated—gunmetal/pewter with a hint of rosiness—and the build feels solid, though the stock cable is thick and the swappable plugs rely on friction with no positive lock, which can pull loose. Fit is still large, but notably better than recent Monarch generations: once seated it’s stable and secure enough for long sessions, even if it won’t disappear in-ear.

Tonally, Valhalla targets a clean neutral with a meaty, sub-bass–focused boost, slightly warmer through the mids and less peaky up top than Monarch Mk IV. Despite being all-BA, the bass feels more dynamic and satisfying than the Monarch’s, and the big story is technical performance: imaging, separation, stage definition, and overall resolution are genuinely standout—“flagship-grade” in a way many kilobuck sets aren’t. Downsides are the sheer size and that cumbersome cable, but as a listen it’s special and compelling. Verdict: four stars out of five, and an easy pick over Monarch Mk IV on sonics if the fit works.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 7* * score rescaled + normalized
Super Review says AFUL’s Dawn-X is the brand’s best execution of its house sound yet—a $1,300 flagship tribrid with 14 drivers (DD + 8 BA + 4 EST + bone conduction) that fits comfortably and consistently. The tuning is warm and bass-weighted but tight and fast, with precise, slightly assertive treble; staging isn’t very wide but has good front-to-back depth and strong clarity. Versus peers like FiiO FX17, 64 Audio U4s, Dunu Glacier, and Monarch MK4, it favors control and bass quality over maximum width or excitement; he calls it very good but evolutionary and rates it 3/5 stars.
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL’s house sound shows up here in its most polished form: Dawn-X is a tribrid (1DD + 8BA + 4EST + bone conduction) flagship at $1,300 that prioritizes consistent fit and execution over flash. Build is understated with stabilized-wood faceplates, above-average isolation, and a medium/medium-large shell that fits better—and more consistently—than the Cantor. The accessory loadout is solid (four silicone tip sets, large but well-made case), though the stock cable does not have swappable terminations (choose 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm).

Tonally, it’s a balanced, warmer-leaning take on AFUL’s signature: a dense, controlled bass that borders on decadent yet stays quick and clean, slightly relaxed mids, and a precise, mildly forward lower-treble that keeps definition high without tipping into harshness for most listeners. Stage favors front-to-back depth over width; transients are clean and a touch clinical, giving strong separation without sounding smeary. The result is a mature, confident presentation that reads refined rather than showy.

Against peers: versus Cantor, Dawn-X is warmer, smoother, and far more consistent thanks to fit; Cantor can sound brighter and a bit wider. Compared with FiiO FX17, Dawn-X has tighter bass and crisper treble, where FX17 feels looser and fuller. The 64 Audio U4s plays softer and wider; Dawn-X is more precise/clinical. DUNU Glacier hits harder and more V-shaped with smoother treble but less natural acoustic timbre; Dawn-X sounds truer on instruments. Versus ThieAudio Monarch MK4, MK4 is more neutral, vocal-forward with greater width, while Dawn-X offers denser low-end and a calmer demeanor—and a friendlier fit for many ears. Verdict: 3/5 stars—not the flashiest in its bracket, but arguably AFUL’s best execution yet of its signature sound.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Thieaudio Valhalla reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 9 * score rescaled + normalized
4 community members have rated the THIEAUDIO Valhalla at an average of 4.8/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Exceptional.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 9 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the AFUL DAWN-X at an average of 5.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Masterpiece.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Thieaudio Valhalla (more reviews)

Thieaudio Valhalla reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 8.7 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A+ Tech
Youtube Video Summary

ThieAudio Valhalla comes in hot as a true flagship challenger: a titanium shell housing 19 drivers14 “Sonion” and five “Knowles"—and a price planted in the ~$2K bracket. This tier isn’t like GPUs where benchmarks decide winners; earphones here are closer to watches—craft, taste, and execution. On that score, Valhalla feels legit: premium build, branded internals, and tuning aimed squarely at high-end competition that regularly asks two to three times more.

The low end lands with plenty of energy and control—808 drops for Ghetto Boys/Public Enemy/Wu-Tang/Kendrick/Tupac/Outkast hit clean, while four- and five-string bass guitar lines carry real texture and decay. Iconic kick work like “When the Levee Breaks” thumps with satisfying weight without smearing. Midrange is dialed: no bloated mid-bass warming up female vocals, no shouty upper mids pushing voices unnaturally forward—great for a vocal-centric library and classic cuts (think “Sultans of Swing”). Up top, harmonics extend with air and clarity without the zingy fatigue—decays aren’t chopped off, so cymbals and overtones feel complete rather than muted.

On ranking, this reads as a top-five contender with this library, easily competing with sets in the $4–6K lane on balance, quality, and tuning. The only real ding is the presentation box, which doesn’t scream “luxury” the way the sound and build do. Verdict: squarely between “would buy” and “going to hype it.” Given ThieAudio’s run of legit releases (Monarch line, Oracle MKIII, etc.), Valhalla fits the pattern—no weak link in the chain, just a serious flagship play at a price that undercuts many rivals.

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel

Thieaudio Valhalla reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 8.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
Deep bass despite all BA set, techs carry this set more than the overall tone Treble is mushy for something with so many BAs, not for high frequency enjoyers

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: S- Mids: A+ Treble: A Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: S

Thieaudio Valhalla reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 8.1 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
check links for more info:

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: S- Mids: A Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Details: S- Imaging: S-

Thieaudio Valhalla reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 7.5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
S tier for COD, borders A- for other titles
Youtube Video Summary

Thieaudio Valhalla lands as a lavish, 19-BA-per-side flagship tuned warm-natural with a palpable sub-bass emphasis, quick attack/decay, and standout separation and layering. Vocals read both natural and technical—male and female alike—without bass bleed, while the treble carries enough air to keep micro-detail clean. Comfort and build impress, making it an easy all-day daily driver and a legitimate endgame pick for music that also crosses over to gaming.

In shooters, Valhalla excels at depth perception, verticality, and parsing simultaneous cues. For Call of Duty it’s an outright S-tier: footsteps, fly-ins, and distant strikes are easy to place with zero guesswork. In Apex Legends it sits around A to A-—gunfire is beautifully controlled, but super-light slides/taps can be a touch subdued. In Valorant it’s highly competitive with top open-backs, while in CS2 the tuning keeps gunfire less shouty and footstep reads strong, making it a great IEM choice overall. Net result on the “wallhack certification” scale: A to A- across multiple titles—an expensive IEM that earns its keep if both music enjoyment and competitive clarity are on the checklist.


Fresh Reviews original ranking

Fresh Reviews Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X (more reviews)

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 9 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X goes straight for spectacle: a $1,300 tribrid behemoth with 14 drivers per side—one dynamic, eight BAs, four electrostats, and a bone conductor—that turns familiar tracks into a surreal remix. The presentation is described as “Poltergeist in an IEM,” with spatial effects that feel like a live DSP engine: four imaginary DJs slicing and reassembling the mix on the fly. Every song becomes an event—an Unreal-Engine-in-a-cave vibe—yet it stays coherent enough to be addictive rather than broken, delivering a wildly unique listen that nothing else in the collection replicates.

Forget reading the squiggle: measurements look “normal,” but the sound is anything but. The stage is huge, imaging is hyper-layered, and transient effects pop out and retract with uncanny tactility—great for ASMR, movies, and games where holographic placement sells the illusion. Despite the driver count, it’s not hard to drive; volume needs are moderate, nowhere near planar-pain territory. This is the “break-glass-when-bored” set—the one to pull out after years in the hobby when everything else feels samey and a jolt of abnormal brilliance is required.

Build and accessories match the price: gargantuan shells with stabilized wooden faceplates, a premium cable, a neat leather strap, and a buffet of individually boxed tips, though termination is a simple 3.5 or 4.4 choice. Ergonomics demand some ear real estate, but the payoff is a sound signature that’s gloriously weird and deeply entertaining. Recommendation: not a first or only IEM—save it for collectors who already have “normal” covered and want a statement piece that rewires how music feels.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S+ Tech
Balanced all-rounder with fun bass, lifelike mids, very smooth and refined treble, highly resolving and immersive, with great soundstage and precise imaging. Textured, punchy bass, natural mids, ethereal female vocals, smooth, airy, and non-fatiguing treble, top-tier resolution.
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X arrives as a premium, resin-shelled flagship with a striking red-wood faceplate, a soft 4.4 mm cable, a protective zipper case, and multiple silicone tips. The shells run large but are well-contoured and vented, offering excellent comfort for extended sessions; those with smaller ears should demo first. Build and accessories are solid overall, with only some cable memory above the chin slider worth noting.

Tuning follows a mild V-shape: a moderate, textured bass lift; natural mids with lifelike vocal timbre; and a smooth, extended treble that brings air and detail without harshness. Kicks have weight and EDM carries rumble, yet vocals remain clear; male voices retain grit without thickness, while female vocals sound airy and sweet. Treble presents shimmer and clarity in a non-fatiguing way—ideal for long listens, though not for fans of aggressively boosted highs or outright bass-head needs.

Technical performance is a highlight: resolution, separation, imaging, and stage depth rank among the best at the price, creating immersive layering and precise placement even on busy tracks. Versus AFUL Caner, Dawn-X offers stronger, tighter bass, smoother treble, better comfort, and more refined layering; compared to FiiO’s FX17 and BGVP Solomon, it sounds cleaner, more naturally voiced, and less fatiguing. Against Elleian Apostle, the Apostle hits harder down low, while Dawn-X feels more balanced and immersive. Recommended for those who want a fun-yet-natural, all-rounder flagship with effortless treble and textured mids—less so for meta-leaning bright V tunings or very small ears. Final verdict: 4.5/5, a top contender at its price.


Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 9 Reviewer Score
Slightly warm tilted neutral. Very well balanced with a tasteful bass boost. Bass is surprisingly very weighty and textured with quick decay so bass notes don't linger and overstay their welcome. Lush sounding with very good vocals. Typical AFUL pinna gain region which, as expected, results in very pleasant female vocals that aren't in your face and aren't shouty. Treble is very well extended with a good amount of shimmer and air but at the same time it never gets sibilant. In fact, I'd say treble is silky smooth. Imaging is crisp and realistic with fantastic instrument separation. The stage is enveloping, with good depth and width but it's not excessively large - overall it sounds very natural, with distinctly noticeable layering. Very good technicalities. This is the peak of the AFUL house sound and to date the most natural sounding flagship IEM I've heard. Where a lot of $1k+ IEMs rely on gimmicky tuning to make them sound more impressive, which comes at the cost of sacrificing timbre - the Dawn X sounds natural throughout the frequency response. Build quality is great - the stabilized wood shells are nice. Unfortunately the overall look of the IEM is contentious - the red color doesn't pop much and the AFUL branding on the earpieces is objectively a detractor - if they put Dawn-X on the earpieces, I suspect AFUL would see a huge lift in sales. Nonetheless, these are the best sounding IEMs I've tried to date.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 9 Reviewer Score
S+ Tuning
S+ Tech
Rating: S+ | Value: ⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮🎮 | Comfort: 6 natural midrange. ethereal treble. totl techs. rip small ears
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Dawn-X arrives as a 12-driver quad-brid flagship (1 DD, 8 BA, 4 EST, 1 bone conduction) priced at $1,300. The unboxing mirrors AFUL’s higher-end sets: big leather case, cable clip, four ear-tip sets, cleaning brush, plus a soft but slightly memory-prone cable available in 3.5 or 4.4—and given the set’s power hunger, 4.4 makes sense. Design skews conservative: a red stabilized-wood faceplate paired with a plain black shell that doesn’t showcase the intricate internals. The shell is also very large (think Monarch-sized), creating comfort issues; small ears will struggle. Tip sensitivity is high, and stock tips provide the most balanced result.

Tonally this is classic AFUL house sound: a mild V with a slightly warm, musical tilt that remains balanced overall. Bass hits with punch, texture, and sub-bass rumble without bloat—ample enough for bass fans yet controlled. The midrange is a standout: natural, lush vocals with male voices gaining a touch from the warmth and female vocals kept more neutral, preserving timbral authenticity and emotional nuance. Treble is rich, smooth, and well-extended; the ESTs are tuned tastefully—no harsh glare—adding just the right air and sparkle. The bone-conduction driver focuses on mids and stays subtle in practice.

Technically, Dawn-X competes with top peers: high resolution, excellent separation, and rare cohesion for a multi-driver design. Imaging and layering feel strikingly realistic, while stage favors depth over width (wider sets like Fatfreq Quantum still outspread it). As a recommendation, it suits listeners seeking a slightly warm, highly detailed, all-rounder; it’s not ideal for small ears, lean-bass preferences, or those wanting brighter upper-mids/treble. Despite strong diminishing returns above mid-fi prices, Dawn-X punches above its tag and earns a rare two-star recommendation from Kois Archive—a flagship that feels genuinely special if the fit works.


Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

AFUL Dawn-X reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech

The AFUL Dawn-X is a 14-driver quadbrid IEM—1DD+8BA+4EST+1BC—wired together via a six-way electronic + physical crossover and AFUL’s 3D Micro-Resonance acoustic paths; the stabilized-wood shells and included 6N copper cable reinforce its flagship positioning. Specs are published at 15 Ω and 101 dB sensitivity, with an official MSRP of $1,299.99.

Early listening reports describe a balanced-to-U-shaped tuning with textured sub-bass, forward yet clean vocals, and airy treble extension; some note abundant micro-detail that can make the stage feel more intimate on certain tracks. AFUL also claims a “Wideband Electrostatic” implementation letting EST drivers contribute from ~5 kHz upward, which aligns with impressions of crisp but smooth top-end energy.

Objectively, the Dawn-X targets high technical performance—resolution, imaging precision, and treble refinement—more than aggressive coloration, which suits critical listening but may read as slightly cool on some material. Given the price bracket, value hinges on a buyer needing its specific mix of detail retrieval and composure versus similarly ambitious hybrids from rivals at or below the same MSRP.


Bass: S- Mids: A+ Treble: S- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: A+

Thieaudio Valhalla User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

AFUL Dawn-X User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Thieaudio Valhalla Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.9

Gaming Grade

A

AFUL Dawn-X Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8.1

Gaming Grade

A+

Thieaudio Valhalla Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • Expect a tasteful, well-judged response that feels both musical and true to the source. Great synergy with a wide range of genres.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • It sounds refined and controlled, keeping instruments neatly separated with immersive staging. Busy arrangements remain neatly organized.
Bass A+
You hear powerful yet disciplined low-end slam that extends effortlessly. It marries sub-bass depth with great texture.
Mids A+
The midrange sounds refined and revealing, balancing clarity with emotional weight. Timbre accuracy rivals studio monitors.
Treble A
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics A+
The presentation feels expansive, letting micro and macro dynamics breathe. There's a sense of limitless headroom.
Soundstage S-
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging that lets instruments float naturally around you. It paints a holographic bubble around you.
Details S-
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers while maintaining natural timbre. It uncovers hidden layers with ease.
Imaging S-
Movement flows gracefully, tracing arcs that are rendered with surgical accuracy. Movement effects are rendered with precision.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

AFUL Dawn-X Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • Tonal balance reaches a highly refined state, sounding seamless from lows to highs. Everything locks together with satisfying coherence.

Average Technical Grade

S
  • Expect an effortlessly clean presentation that keeps complex mixes perfectly organized. There is zero sense of congestion even at high volume.
Bass S-
Expect a gripping low-end presence that marries clarity with visceral impact. Dynamic swings land with thrilling force.
Mids S-
The midrange sounds refined and revealing, balancing clarity with emotional weight. Timbre accuracy rivals studio monitors.
Treble S-
The treble performance feels luxurious, marrying air, control, and excitement. You can place every high-frequency element.
Dynamics A
The system snaps into action with precision, highlighting every swell. Recordings feel energetic and alive.
Soundstage S-
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.
Details S-
No subtlety is too small; the presentation exposes it all with composure. Complex tracks remain crystal clear.
Imaging A+
Even dense mixes remain locked in place, reinforcing the illusion of physical performers. The stage remains stable regardless of complexity.
Gaming A+
Reliable positional tracking with good environmental awareness. Maintains clarity during busy scenes while conveying atmospheric depth. Premium pricing warrants consideration of gaming-first alternatives for lower cost

Thieaudio Valhalla User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

AFUL Dawn-X User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer