Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda VS Ziigaat LUSH
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda and Ziigaat LUSH are in-ear monitors. Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda costs $169 while Ziigaat LUSH costs $180. Ziigaat LUSH is $11 more expensive. Ziigaat LUSH holds a decisive 1.3-point edge in reviewer scores (5.5 vs 6.8). Ziigaat LUSH has significantly better mids with a 2.5-point edge, Ziigaat LUSH has significantly better treble with a 1.5-point edge, Ziigaat LUSH has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and Ziigaat LUSH has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda | Ziigaat LUSH |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 5.5 | 7 |
| Mids | 5 | 7.5 |
| Treble | 5 | 6.5 |
| Soundstage | 6 | 7 |
| Dynamics | 5 | 6 |
| Tonality | 4.5 | 6.8 |
| Technicalities | 5 | 7 |
Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda Aggregated Review Score
Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda Average Reviewer Scores
Ziigaat LUSH Aggregated Review Score
Ziigaat LUSH Average Reviewer Scores
Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $169
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Ziigaat LUSH Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+4BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $180
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda User Review Score
Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Ziigaat LUSH User Review Score
Ziigaat LUSH Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.9Gaming Grade
CZiigaat LUSH Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.1Gaming Grade
A-Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Ziigaat LUSH Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
A-- Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda Reviews
Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda reviewed by: Jaytiss
5.5
Reviewer Score
Shouty, expensive, but not without merrit. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ziigaat LUSH Reviews
Ziigaat LUSH reviewed by: Drew / Audionotions
8
Reviewer Score
As of 4/21/25, these are my pick for best value in IEMs and also one of the best implementations of the JM21 meta. Everything sounds right. Bass quantity is just right with decent quality - there is a good amount of physicality and it doesn't overwhem. Mids are tasteful - perhaps slightly laid back but not egregiously so. Treble is well extended and very smooth. It won't wow anyone looking for a very large stage but it is on the larger size. Dynamics and transients are pretty good on this set, lending to a pretty good sense of instrument separation and imaging. Personally, I would like a little bit more elevation in the mids to upper mid range to make it a bit more snappy and engaging but as is, the tuning makes for an excellent all-day IEM. One thing to note is that build quality is a bit lacking and the packaging/accessories are fit for a $20 IEM. Previously Owned
Ziigaat LUSH reviewed by: Jaytiss
7.5
Reviewer Score
Mid mid focused set, I dig it. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ziigaat LUSH reviewed by: Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
A cleaner more technical AFUL Explorer with a more open sense of space and airier treble. High volume set. Very smooth and balanced at higher scaling - has a "Lush" and full sound. Mid-volume sounds kinda anemic and too inoffensive, wouldn't rec at lower volumes unless you're using as background music while working, but very immersive with scaling like the Odyssey, but less v and more chill. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Ziigaat LUSH reviewed by: Tim Tuned
6
Reviewer Score
Very niche relaxed tuning Too compressed sounding for me Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Ziigaat LUSH reviewed by:
Fresh Reviews
6*
* The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
The Ziigaat Arcanis and Lush IEMs offer distinct flavors at their price points, both featuring resin builds with eye-catching faceplates—sparkly green for the Arcanis and silver-black for the Lush. Fit is familiar to other Ziigaat models, and accessories include a basic cable, ear tips, and carrying pouch. Sonically, the Arcanis delivers a holographic, punchy presentation with emphasized sub-bass and upper mids, making footsteps, slides, and distant gunfire pop with urgency. The Lush leans darker and smoother, relaxing upper mids to tame gunfire harshness while maintaining clean bass and excellent separation.
For gaming, performance varies by title. In Valorant and CS2, the Lush shines with precise imaging and a smoother, fatigue-free experience—gunfire feels controlled without sacrificing detail. The Arcanis excels in COD, where its aggressive tuning highlights critical cues like footsteps and slides with greater potency. However, in Apex Legends, the Lush’s relaxed profile struggles with subtle audio cues (e.g., light taps or shield cells), earning a B rating. The Arcanis fares better (B+) with superior depth reads and emphasis on environmental sounds, though complex fights can overwhelm its separation compared to top-tier sets like the Mangird Tea Pro.
Ultimately, the Arcanis is a versatile all-rounder, slightly favored for both music and most gaming scenarios. The Lush carves a niche for smooth, non-fatiguing sessions in Valorant/CS2, filling a unique spot in Ziigaat’s lineup. Both IEMs offer exceptional resolution and layering for their prices, but the choice hinges on preference: the Arcanis for its energetic clarity, or the Lush for its refined, relaxed signature.
Ziigaat LUSH reviewed by: Z-Reviews
6
* score normalized
Ziigaat LUSH reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Nice take on new-meta tuning. A little bit more relaxed but nice.Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel
Ziigaat Lush lands at $180 with a hybrid 1DD + 4BA setup and the brand’s familiar accessories: a slim case, silicone tips (S/M/L), and one foam pair. The cable is lightweight but tangly, and the all-plastic shells feel light yet a bit cheap. Fit is stable yet not ideal— the long nozzle can bottom out, tip selection becomes important, and there’s some driver flex. Aesthetics are decent, though the logo and overall build leave room for improvement.
Sonically, this is a “new meta” take: fuller lower mids, relaxed upper mids, and laid-back treble that can read a touch dark. The tonality is warm, smooth, and low-contrast; vocals sit a bit back and busy mixes can feel smoothed over. Treble avoids sharpness but can be inconsistent (sometimes blurred, sometimes a little chunky), and overall incisiveness depends heavily on tip choice. Bass isn’t overblown on the graph, yet comes across stronger in practice because the top end is subdued—impact is fine, definition is average. Imaging isn’t razor-sharp, though the stage can feel surprisingly wide.
Against peers, EPZ P50 sounds more contrasty with tighter bass, crisper treble, better imaging, and much better comfort. Kiwi Ears K4 brings more sparkle and sharper imaging (bass can dominate at times), again with superior fit. A cheaper alt, the AFUL Explorer, offers a similarly laid-back vibe with tighter bass, more consistent/airy treble, and an easier fit. Net: Lush is a pleasant, relaxed alternative for the treble-sensitive, but build and comfort hold it back. Rating: 3/5.
Tin Hifi P1 Max 2 Panda User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewZiigaat LUSH User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review