UM Mavis VS 64 Audio U4s

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

UM Mavis and 64 Audio U4s are in-ear monitors. UM Mavis costs $1,079 while 64 Audio U4s costs $1,100. 64 Audio U4s is $21 more expensive. 64 Audio U4s holds a decisive 2.5-point edge in reviewer scores (5.6 vs 8.1). 64 Audio U4s has significantly better bass with a 3-point edge, 64 Audio U4s has significantly better mids with a 2.7-point edge, 64 Audio U4s has significantly better treble with a 2.2-point edge, 64 Audio U4s has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge, 64 Audio U4s has significantly better details with a 1.8-point edge and 64 Audio U4s has significantly better imaging with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric UM Mavis 64 Audio U4s
Bass 5 8
Mids 5.5 8.2
Treble 5 7.2
Details 5.5 7.3
Soundstage 6 7
Imaging 6.5 7.5
Dynamics 8 8
Gaming capabilities 4.8 6.5

UM Mavis Aggregated Review Score

UM Mavis Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

5.6

Mixed


64 Audio U4s Aggregated Review Score

64 Audio U4s Average Reviewer Scores

Smirk Audio Jaytiss Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

8.1

Very Positive


UM Mavis User Review Score

UM Mavis Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio U4s User Review Score

64 Audio U4s Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

UM Mavis Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.8

Gaming Grade

C

64 Audio U4s Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.5

Gaming Grade

B+

UM Mavis Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging B+
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio U4s Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A+
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics A+
Superb dynamic range - powerful yet nuanced. Exceptional transient response with lifelike impact and subtle volume gradations.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

UM Mavis Reviews

UM Mavis reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 5.6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Comment: Warm and inoffensive. Very natural sounding Limited by clarity

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: C+ Mids: B- Treble: C+ Soundstage: B Details: B- Imaging: B+

64 Audio U4s Reviews

64 Audio U4s reviewed by:

Smirk Audio 7.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
A tastefully colored U12t with a more intimate soundstage, a cutback in technicalities, and more bass realism.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

- Smirk Audio
Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Details: A Imaging: A+

64 Audio U4s reviewed by:

Super* Review 9* * score normalized

64 Audio U4s reviewed by:

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
It's a solid set, with great build quality, but sonically isn't the specialist that I want it to be.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: S Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A-

64 Audio U4s reviewed by:

Precogvision 7.7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Fantastic colored tonality with options, and the unique technical qualities to back it up. M12/M15 modules recommended.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Details: A- Imaging: A-

UM Mavis User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio U4s User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer