Xenns Tea Pro VS EPZ P50

Youtube Video Summary

The Xenns Tea Pro stands as the most refined and well-rounded iteration of the Tea series to date, offering strong competition in the $300 IEM market. While it loses some of the unique "sauce" found in earlier models, it delivers significant improvements, particularly sounding like a "better Da Vinci" with its bass presentation. The Pro features a similar heaviness and thickness to the notes but adds more upper mids, treble extension, and overall better resolution. For roughly $60 more than the Da Vinci, the Pro offers upgraded drivers from Knowles, contributing to better timbre, a bump in technical performance, and equally good accessories.

Compared to the original Tea and Tea 2, the Pro emerges as the better all-rounder but lacks their distinct character. The original Tea remains superior for its highly addicting vocals, bite, and holographic staging, while the Pro offers more balanced, fuller, smoother, and more versatile vocals alongside superior bass in slam, texture, impact, resolution, and rumble due to its new dual dynamic drivers. Treble extension, overall resolution, and a more open stage also see noticeable improvements over both predecessors. Technical performance-wise, the Pro is highly competitive with other $200+ IEMs, offering better resolution, imaging, transience, attack, and separation than the Da Vinci, along with a more natural sound.

Positioned under $400, the Tea Pro fits as a balanced choice between neutral and exciting tunings. Against the clean, neutral Pilgrim or Dusk, the Pro provides a bassier, heavier, fuller sound with more forward vocals and better note weight. Compared to the exciting Estrella, the Pro is more balanced, thicker, and slams harder, while the Estrella offers more dynamic contrast and crispier treble. Versus the similarly priced Hype 4, the Pro delivers harder slam, deeper bass, and sharper vocals with more bite, though the Hype 4 is slightly quicker, smoother, and more balanced. Essentially, the Tea Pro excels as a versatile, resolving set with satisfying bass and well-tuned vocals, making it the best pick for most listeners despite losing some quirks of earlier models.

Youtube Video Summary

The EPZ P50 comes in hot as a new tribrid and a potential $200 neutral benchmark, trading sterile restraint for a more vocal-centric presentation. Versus the MEGA5EST, vocals sit a touch more forward—adding emotional weight and clarity—while the MEGA5EST still edges it on sheer smoothness and EST “air.” Compared to Meteor, the P50 fills in the lower mids, dials back 1–3 kHz glare, and opens the top end a bit; Meteor stays a hair softer up top. The catch is bass: the P50’s DD is competent but not a sub-bass shaker—expect clean rather than authoritative slam.

Against peers, the P50 sounds fuller and more natural than Supermix 4 (which is brighter and more “hi-fi” energetic), and it trades blows with Odyssey: Odyssey brings better bass texture and treble micro-detail, while the P50 delivers superior vocal clarity and a touch more air. It excels at mid-volume listening—Volume S needs more gain to bloom—and outclasses lighter, air-tilted sets like “K4” style tunings when male vocals or body are the priority. Accessory game is strong too: a nicer cable and a genuinely sturdy hard-leather case sweeten the deal. Not the most “unique” flavor and not for bassheads, but as a balanced, clean, vocal-forward option around $200, P50 is an easy recommendation for those chasing neutrality without the vanilla.

Youtube Video Summary

The Xenns Tea Pro impresses most with its exceptional build quality and aesthetics. The metallic shell feels substantial and premium in the ear, featuring a comfortable wing design and a nice metal nozzle. While slightly larger than its predecessors like the Tea and Tea2, the Pro's shell represents an upgrade in feel and technology, boasting a prettier faceplate. The included cable is thick, braided, and features a swappable termination (4.4mm or 3.5mm), contributing to an overall solid package that feels like a significant step up from previous models.

Sonically, the Tea Pro offers a bassy but clean signature with strong, impactful low end. However, it presents some key drawbacks: the bass can feel slightly boomy or distorted rather than pristine, and the overall presentation leans dark and rich. This comes at the expense of upper treble sparkle, air, and micro-details, resulting in a narrow soundstage and less impressive instrument separation than expected at its price point. While extremely pleasant and engaging for music listening, it feels slightly muffled and lacks the clarity and detail retrieval of many competitors.

When stacked against rivals like the Dunu Da Vinci, Kiwi Ears Quintet, EM10, DUNU DaVinci, Hype 4, or CCA CA4, the Tea Pro often falls short sonically. Competitors generally offer better air, treble extension, cleaner bass, or superior detail. Its own predecessor, the Tea2, is considered more neutral and relaxed. Consequently, while the Tea Pro is a contender with its fantastic build and fun tuning, it might be skippable for those prioritizing pure sound quality. It earns a recommendation for newcomers or those valuing premium construction, but audiophiles seeking the best sound may find better options elsewhere.

Youtube Video Summary

Xenns Tea Pro lands as an easy pick around $300 thanks to a natural, versatile tuning that blends tasteful fun with everyday usability. A gentle bass boost adds heft, slam, and definition without muddying the mids, while a touch of upper-mid lift keeps vocals clear—even on bass-heavy tracks—without tipping into thin or clinical territory. Treble stays smooth regardless of shallow or deep fit, supporting lifelike timbre and realistic decay that favors long, fatigue-free listening. Detail comes across as “natural detail” rather than etched; micro-nuances don’t jump out, but nothing feels missing or dulled either.

Against the Top Pro, bass through mids on the Top Pro can sound a bit tighter and more transparent, but its treble risks feeling overcooked and a touch “BA-like,” trading naturalness for extra sparkle and perceived detail. Tea Pro keeps the highs non-fatiguing and tonally convincing, making it the safer everyday choice. The “dream combo” would marry Top Pro’s bass-to-upper-mids with Tea Pro’s treble, but as it stands, Tea Pro remains a well-balanced, easy recommendation for its class—natural yet fun, clean vocals, and a bonus metal shell that seals the deal for all-day use.

Youtube Video Summary

Xenns Tea Pro lands with the familiar “Tea” swagger: a baby-blue, sparkled shell that looks subdued but premium, a modular 3.5/4.4 cable that clicks together more cleanly than most, and the infamous ultra-soft pouch (yes, the “chinchilla” one). Build is hefty yet comfortable, with a tiny ear “shelf” that doesn’t poke and giant L/R markers that actually help. Inside is an 8-driver stack—2 dynamic + 6 balanced armatures—priced around $360, right in the historic Tea lane. Wide-bore tips can make the upper range shouty, but switch to foams or X-Elastic and the tuning snaps into place: smooth, powerful, and deeply satisfying.

Sonically it’s the sports car that rides like a chaise lounge: speed and detail on tap, but with the warmth dialed up ~20% so long sessions feel luxurious. Bass reaches low with a tactile rumble that sneaks up in tracks, mids are rich and present, and treble is tastefully shaved to avoid glare—energy without edge. The stage isn’t stadium-wide; instead it’s an immersive “pressed-in” bubble that places the orchestra around the head with excellent instrument presence and macro-dynamics. It carries the Tea/T2 lineage forward by focusing less on sterile “detail points” and more on excitement and physicality—music shoved into the ear in the most pleasurable way. Verdict: an unabashed 10/10 crowd-pleaser in its bracket and a default recommendation—pop on the 4.4 plug, use the right tips, and let it cook.

Youtube Video Summary

Xenns Tea Pro lands as a confident mid-tier contender with a 2DD+6BA setup around $350–360, going head-to-head with sets like DaVinci, Estrella, and Dusk. Sub-bass has real grunt—808 drops, the 38 Hz hit on Big Boi’s “Kill Jill,” and early-2000s hip-hop cues slam with authority yet stay controlled. Electric-bass lines have clean pluck and release, avoiding mid-bass bloom, so the low end never muddies male or female vocals; the tuning plots close to a favored target without sounding sterile.

The midrange keeps vocals center and natural—no husky haze from mid-bass, no shout from upper-mids—and treble carries harmonics without tizzy edge, handling tricky voices (think Neil Young, Elton John, Jim Croce) with ease. Fans of the Moondrop Variations’ leaner, drier 3 kHz-pushed profile may find the Tea Pro richer and less “etched,” but that extra body reads as musical rather than bloated. Crucially, the BAs avoid that metallic tinge, giving cymbals and keys a clean, pleasing sheen.

On balance, this is the kind of tuning that competes directly with its peers—and depending on priorities, arguably beats them. With punchy sub-bass, stable mids, smooth but detailed top end, and zero fatiguing quirks, the Tea Pro sits between a firm “would buy” and a potential “shameless hype” slot—prime material for renewed top-five shortlists now that the market has cooled.

Youtube Video Summary

Build & presentation scream premium: a matte metal alloy shell with lush green-blue fade and gold script, plus a black-silver sparkle faceplate that looks like wearable art. Ergonomics are excellent despite a slightly wider nozzle and a bit of heft, allowing long sessions without discomfort. The package impresses with a gallery-style unboxing, matching carrying case, and a silver cable with interchangeable 3.5/4.4 terminations. Under the hood: 2 dynamic drivers + 6 BAs at ~$360.

Tonally it’s a balanced, warmer-leaning set with elevated sub-bass depth, clean attack/decay, and more treble extension and sparkle than comparable sets. The stage sits a touch more intimate, but separation and layering are immaculate, and imaging locks in with precision. Mids don’t pop as forward as some peers, yet overall resolution stays high with “oodles of detail,” giving music a rich, cohesive presentation that still feels highly detailed.

For competitive play the performance is A-tier: in Apex, Valorant, and especially Call of Duty, imaging and depth perception are master-class. Gunfire comes through cleaner with less reverb; airstrikes and mortar noise get pushed back so crucial cues like footsteps, slides, and shield pops cut through. The more intimate stage aids crosshair placement and micro-positioning, while separation stays clear even in chaotic fights. Verdict: a high A- on the Wall-Hack Certified list—an excellent pick for gamers wanting warmth, sub-bass authority, and elite imaging without sacrificing musical enjoyment.

Youtube Video Summary

EPZ P50 comes as a tribrid at $185 with a surprisingly complete kit: a sturdy leatherette case, modular 3.5/4.4mm terminations, three silicone tip sets, and a cleaning cloth. The resin shells are semi-custom with aluminum faceplates; comfort is generally good but anatomy-dependent, and the stock cable—while well finished—runs on the stiff side. A standout twist is the factory customization option (~$225 total for the “Grindphones” style), which notably doesn’t alter the tuning in any meaningful way. The set is easy to drive, shows minimal change with impedance adapters (a touch warmer/more vocal-forward), and avoids pressure issues thanks to smart internal venting.

Sonically, tuning sits as a controlled, mild V: bass is just north of neutral with pleasing texture and impact, mids stay clean with an engaging female-vocal emphasis, and treble adds airy sparkle without turning tizzy—though insertion depth can trigger length-mode variability for some ears. Technical chops impress at the price: detail retrieval punches up, imaging is precise with good separation, and stage reads average but coherent. Against peers, P50 feels more resolving than Kiwi Ears K4 (trades bigger bass/sparkle for better mid clarity), brighter and more vocal-present than the neutral-leaning Ziigaat Lush, and echoes a Dunu Da Vinci vibe with less bass. Verdict: tremendous value and a terrific pick for vocal-centric libraries—highly recommended to audition first if treble sensitivity or fit quirks are a concern.

Youtube Video Summary

EPZ’s P50 feels like a breakout for the brand: a compact, medium-small shell with a vented faceplate that’s marketed as “open-back,” yet isolates like a typical IEM. The unboxing is tidy at this price—carry puck, a real microfiber cloth, and two sets of generic tips—while the modular cable (screw-lock swappable termination) is handy if a bit thin, stiff, and kink-prone; the 2-pin plug sits slightly proud of the socket and the “R” marking is visible on the outside. The long nozzle (~5.5 mm diameter) can push fit depth, so shorter tips (e.g., NF Audio-style) help; once set, stability and comfort are excellent. Overall build looks clean and modern, if a touch editorial compared with EPZ’s other shells.

Sonically, P50 embraces the current tilted diffuse-field “new meta” with a mostly neutral, natural presentation and a later-rising, sub-bass-centric lift that gives bounce rather than mid-bass thump. There’s a hint of extra presence around the 4–5 kHz region that adds macro-contrast—vocals pop with definition and separation is crisp—while upper treble stays safe: cymbals are clean but a bit light in weight. Bass is tight and incisive rather than slammy; micro-texture on vocals is good, though the set favors that big, “stagey” contrast over ultra-fine grain. It’s easily EPZ’s best tuning so far: clear, organized, and engaging without drifting from neutral-ish aims.

Against peers, Kiwi Ears K4 tracks a similar target but sounds lower-contrast and can blur on dense mixes; P50 hits harder on transients, images more cleanly, and keeps busy tracks sorted, while K4 offers a richer midrange with “frothier” treble. Versus the Binary Chopin, Chopin is warmer, fuller, and more mid-bass driven—more “analog” and atmospheric—with deeper perceived space but a bulkier fit; P50 is leaner, clearer, and the least bass-forward of the three. Verdict: a confident 4/5 for delivering a small, comfy fit and a clean, contrasty neutral that competes squarely around $200–$250. If the brief is “neutral with a bit of drama,” this is a strong pick—and a promising sign of where EPZ can go next.

Youtube Video Summary

The EPZ P50 arrives as a ~$200 tribrid with a slick presentation: FR graph on the box, a puck-style case, plenty of tips (oddly two identical sets), and a nice microfiber cloth. Build leans premium with a semi-open back and a faceplate that gives “arc reactor” vibes. The custom shell offers a secure fit for most, though very small ears—or anyone sensitive to an inner wing—may need caution. The modular cable (3.5/4.4 mm) is practical yet slightly stiff and retains some memory; isolation is typical of sealed IEMs despite the semi-open styling.

Sonically, the P50 goes for a warm-balanced tuning. Bass quality impresses: bouncy with deep sub-bass reach, prioritizing texture and control over sheer quantity (more thump is possible via an impedance adapter). Mids read natural with a touch of warmth—male vocals shine—while female vocals can feel a bit lean due to a more relaxed upper-mid energy. Treble is smooth, inoffensive, and “planar-clean” without planar timbre, with only a slight wish for more top-end extension.

Technical performance is the star. The micro planars pull out micro-detail unusually well for the price; imaging, separation, and overall resolution feel confidently executed, making guitars pop and busy mixes easy to parse. That clarity translates to gaming, where positional cues and crowded soundscapes (think battle royale chaos) remain intelligible—worthy of a two-controller gaming nod. Overall, the EPZ P50 is a solid contender at this price: balanced tuning with standout detail retrieval and imaging, tempered only by mids that play it a little safe. For listeners unbothered by a gentler upper-mid lift, it’s well worth the money—a two-star recommendation.