Yanyin Canon II VS Yu9 Que

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Yanyin Canon II and Yu9 Que use 1DD+4BA and 1DD+3BA driver setups respectively. Yanyin Canon II costs $379 while Yu9 Que costs $409. Yu9 Que is $30 more expensive. Yu9 Que holds a clear 0.7-point edge in reviewer scores (7.4 vs 8.1). Yu9 Que carries a user score of 8.5.

Insights

Metric Yanyin Canon II Yu9 Que
Bass 7.4 8
Mids 7.4 8.3
Treble 7.4 7.8
Details 7.4 7.6
Soundstage 7.4 7.9
Imaging 7.4 7.6
Dynamics 7.4 7.6
Tonality 7.5 8.3
Technicalities 6.8 7.9

Yanyin Canon II Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


Yu9 Que Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.1

Very Positive


Reviews Comparison

Yanyin Canon II reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.2 * score rescaled + normalized
19 community members have rated the Yanyin Canon II at an average of 4.4/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Yanyin Canon II or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $379

Buy Yanyin Canon II on Linsoul

Yu9 Que reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the YU9 Que at an average of 4.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Yanyin Canon II reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.2 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech

The Yanyin Canon II delivers a bass performance that stands out in its price range, offering deep extension and textured rumble without overwhelming the mix. Its bio-diaphragm dynamic driver, housed in a dual-chamber design, provides tight control and physicality to low frequencies, making genres like hip-hop and electronic music particularly engaging. The warm, rich midrange maintains good vocal presence and natural timbre, though upper mids can occasionally border on shoutiness with certain tracks.

Treble response is well-extended but exhibits minor inconsistencies, with some roughness in cymbal crashes and upper harmonics that can detract from long-term listening comfort. Technically, the IEM excels in resolution and imaging precision, presenting instruments with strong separation, though its soundstage width remains average. The two bass tuning switches offer subtle adjustments rather than transformative changes, limiting sound customization versatility.

Comfort is a highlight, with the medical-grade resin shells providing an ergonomic fit suitable for extended sessions. However, accessories feel sparse for the price, including only basic ear tips and a serviceable cable. Isolation proves adequate for daily use despite the vented design.


Yu9 Que reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8.3 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech

The YU9 Que is a hybrid IEM using 1 dynamic driver + 3 balanced armatures, positioned in the mid-upper price tier with an MSRP around $399. Retail listings confirm the configuration (10 mm LF DD with three Knowles BA units) and current pricing in USD and MYR, placing it among competitors that emphasize tonal refinement over sheer technical fireworks.

Community impressions describe a balanced/neutral tonality with a tasteful bass lift, smooth upper-mids that avoid glare, and treble that leans non-sibilant. Subjective reports on Head-Fi and Reddit consistently frame the Que as an all-rounder that favors coherence and long-term listenability over maximum micro-detail.

Technically, listeners note solid imaging and macrodynamics with competent detail retrieval, though not class-leading for the price. The manufacturer has also published frequency-response plots (IEC711 and BK5128 rigs), which aligns with the community’s take that the Que targets a broadly neutral/balanced signature rather than an aggressive V-shape. Overall value is credible at its MSRP if you prioritize tonal balance and comfort over ultra-analytical presentation.


Bass: A+ Mids: S- Treble: A+ Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Yanyin Canon II (more reviews)

Yanyin Canon II reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized
Warm, relaxed IEM - technical enough. Has a bass boost. Pretty decent option.
Youtube Video Summary

At $380, the Yanyin Canon II lands in a competitive mid-tier alongside sets like the AFUL Performer 8 and Mangird T2. It’s a hybrid (1DD + 4BA) with a tidy, well-behaved cable and minimal accessories. The shells are medium-large, a bit chunky, with glittered faceplates whose typography/alignment may irk design sticklers; comfort is generally fine at a desk but fit stability can be mediocre during movement or sleep. Two recessed dip switches (tool required) mainly tweak bass by about ~1 dB—best treated as a “both up” vs “both down” toggle rather than four distinct tunings.

Tonally, Canon II reads as neutral-leaning and relaxed: modest upper-mids, a touch dark up top yet still well extended, and a bass shelf that carries some mid-bass “stank” beyond pure sub-bass emphasis. The result is natural timbre with an overall dry presentation—bass has weight without lingering rumble. Technicalities are solid but not showy; imaging/separation is the weak link, skewing more cohesive than dissected, and sitting a bit behind what would be hoped for at this price.

Versus the AFUL Performer 8, Canon II is the warmer, fuller, slightly darker take with more bass presence, while P8 runs brighter/leaner and stages/separates better. If the brief is “neutral with extra bass body” and pleasing timbre, Canon II ticks the box; if headstage and pinpoint placement lead the priorities, P8 makes more sense. Final verdict: a solid 4/5, with tuning versatility and tonality as the draws, and imaging as the compromise.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Yanyin Canon II reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7.2 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Yanyin Canon II hits with a five-driver hybrid (4BA + 1DD) that’s all about huge stage, deep layering, and an addicting sense of air. Two rear switches offer four tunings but they mostly shift bass; the sweet spot is both switches up/up for a rich, room-filling low end that stays clean and separated. It feels like a “$1,000 sound” at ~$379, blending drivers more seamlessly than most 1DD+BA mixes while throwing width and depth that rival favorite wide-stagers like BLON Jojo—only far more refined.

Build and kit are a mixed bag—great cable options (3.5/4.4/2.5) and solid machining, but the box is foam-heavy and tips are basic. Efficiency isn’t extreme, so a balanced output helps. Tip rolling matters: Dekoni foams bring a smooth, natural balance; Sedna Xelastec adds clarity but can get edgy; Dunu SS flattens the mids; “Render” tips push treble a bit too hard. With the bass switches up and foams on, Canon II becomes a big, natural, effortless listen—the kind of tuning that invites dancing rather than nitpicking, and easily one of the most satisfying 4BA+1DD executions heard this year.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

Yanyin Canon II reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 7* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
I would note - great for R6
Youtube Video Summary

The Yanyin Canon II comes in at $379 with a roomy faux-leather case, a solid 2-pin cable, and a striking faceplate. It’s a 4BA + 1DD hybrid with dip switches (default: 1 up / 2 down) that let the bass profile swing subtly to taste. Versus current favorites, sub- and mid-bass sit between the Zens Top (more rumble) and Kiwi Ears Orchestra Lite (less), but the Canon II’s low end hits cleaner and faster than both, avoiding bloat while keeping satisfying weight. Ergonomics are a win too—more comfortable for long sessions than Orchestra Lite, with better verticality, depth, separation, and layering.

In games, Canon II is a beast: the bass control sharpens positional cues, the stage sits slightly closer for emphasis, and treble stays non-fatiguing—no shout, no sting on gunshots or armor cracks. The Zens Top still stretches a touch wider and airier with a notch higher resolution, but asks more money and brings a bit more rumble; unless that extra sub/mid-bass is the goal, Canon II is the smarter pick. Orchestra Lite owners won’t feel forced to upgrade, yet Canon II is clearly a technical step up. Net result: an exceptional all-rounder for music and gaming, trading a hair of ultimate space for control, coherence, and comfort—easily a top recommendation at its price.


Fresh Reviews original ranking

Fresh Reviews Youtube Channel

Yanyin Canon II reviewed by Yifang

Yifang 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B+ Tech

Yu9 Que (more reviews)

Yu9 Que reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 9.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Can lack that Jenesequa "it" factor.
Youtube Video Summary

The YU9 Que sports a premium, durable resin shell in pure black with a metallic-feeling faceplate and a comfortable design featuring an anti-tragus catch. While the build itself feels handsome and unique, the included cable is criticized as wimpy and unpleasant, with a strong suggestion to upgrade it. Accessories are deemed solid, including a nice selection of tips and a particularly praised case with a soft, luxurious interior.

Sonically, the YU9 Que earns immense praise for its exceptional tuning, described as clean, resolute, and non-fatiguing. It delivers strong, textured bass that avoids being overwhelming, coupled with extremely well-done upper mids. While not class-leading in technicalities like micro-detail or instrument separation, its tonal balance is considered sophisticated and reminiscent of far more expensive sets like the Annihilator, even surpassing the Monarch MKII in tuning preference. It's highlighted as a fantastic all-rounder with a smooth, agreeable signature suitable for long listening sessions.

Despite its modest single dynamic driver + 3BA configuration and $409 price point, the YU9 Que is declared a very special and unique IEM, worthy of the hype it received. The review concludes it's a price leader and a highly competent package from a small brand, offering outstanding value and a beautiful, well-executed design that makes it an easy recommendation for those seeking a smooth, non-fatiguing sound.

Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
One of the most refined, fun, engaging, and technically capable IEMs for its price. Treble is very refined and surprisingly not fatiguing. Well-textured bass with strong physicality. Clear, vocals. Refined, non-fatiguing treble with plenty of extension. Class-leading detail and separation. Treble may be too much for some.
Youtube Video Summary

Build & accessories: a hybrid 1DD + 3BA set priced around $399 with a spacious zipper case, multiple silicone tips, pouches, cleaning cloth, and shirt clip. The faceplate’s wavy, stone-like texture looks premium, and the shells use a 2-pin connector. The downside is the stock cable: it’s springy, only in 4.4 mm, and feels below the tier. Fit is serviceable but not ideal—the shell isn’t the most ergonomic, the nozzle lacks a lip, and seating a deeper fit can take a moment; once set, stability is good and tips stayed secure in use.

Sound: this isn’t a “new-meta” curve; it’s a unique, lively tuning. Bass is punchy, dynamic, and highly textured—more physical in practice than the graph suggests, with excellent impact and kick-drum authority. An early rise after 1 kHz pushes vocals front and center for an intimate, engaging presentation without tipping into shout. Treble is refined, sparkly, and well-extended: it is a bright set but avoids harshness, peakiness, sibilance, and fatigue, delivering crisp cymbals and defined transients even for rock and metal at any volume. Technicalities are class-leading under $500 with standout detail retrieval and separation; the one wish is a larger soundstage.

Comparisons & verdict: the Elysian Apostle still wins on bass texture/impact, treble refinement, and overall resolution, but the Yu9 Que offers a convincing “Apostle flavor” at a lower price. Versus Elysian Pilgrim, the Que is fuller and bassier, while Pilgrim’s treble is tamer; versus Volume S, the Que is cleaner, brighter, more detailed as the Volume S trends warmer with more neutral treble; against Dusk DSP, Dusk sounds more natural/balanced but the Que feels more fun and technical. Recommended for those who crave clarity, sparkle, and engagement without fatigue; less ideal if treble-sensitive or preferring a warm, relaxed tonality, and worth demoing for comfort. A top contender and serious gatekeeper around $400—final rating: 4.5/5 with a strong recommendation.


Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 8 Reviewer Score
Balanced, contrasty, highly resolving. Very good transients. Tight bass, clean mids, very well extended treble. The only glaring flaw is the one-dimensional imaging - there is very little layering, unfortunately which can make instruments and vocals sound like they're all standing in a straight line in front of you. Nonetheless, an excellent IEM!

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Yu9 Que reviewed by Fox Told Me So

Fox Told Me So 8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
YU9 Audio QUE is a $300 hybrid (1DD + 3BA) with a name rooted in Chinese culture—“阙” (QUE, palace), paired with a fish bone logo from “鱼” (YU, fish). Shells are aluminum with a sandblasted, wavy faceplate finish.

Tuning is clean, neutral, and slightly V-shaped: bass is tight, bouncy, and textured; mids sit slightly forward thanks to extra 700 Hz–2 kHz gain, giving vocals a bigger image; treble leans bright with a 4–5 kHz push for clarity, rolling off naturally rather than chasing EST-style air. Sibilance can appear (on “th” or “tsu”), but not harsh.

Stage favors width over depth—impressively wide at the price, with neat, well-ordered placement and strong separation. Resolution is crisp, background clean, every note clearly etched.

Fox Told Me So original ranking

Fox Told Me So Youtube Channel
Bass: A Mids: A Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A Imaging: A

Yu9 Que reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 8 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
Rating: S- | Value: ⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮 | Comfort: 9 fun bass. referency midrange. excellent techs could be bright. cable is meh
Youtube Video Summary

Yu9 Que arrives with a surprisingly premium unboxing: a crush-resistant carrying case with plush padding, an IEM pouch, microfiber cloth, cable clip, and two ear-tip sets (standard silicone and more premium liquid silicone). A quirky 3D-printed nameplate with serial number and a faceplate etched in a topographic-map motif give it character. The shell is on the larger, wider side—comfortable for many, but small ears should test fit first. The stock cable is just okay (some memory, no chin slider), though it’s offered in 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm terminations.

Tonally, this is a neutral-reference set with a tasteful bass lift—clean impact without throwing off balance. Sub-bass has satisfying thump and texture, though bass-heads coming from sets like Kiwi Ears Punch may find it polite. The mids sit even and accurate—no “vocal magic,” yet clearly above average. Treble stretches well into the air with a touch of brightness that adds crispness and a slightly clinical edge, staying shy of fatiguing. Technical chops are the draw: a decently wide soundstage (roughly 3–4/5 by comparison), standout 3D imaging, and strong resolution/separation make it excellent for gaming—worthy of a two-controller nod—though ultimate detail still trails pricier kilobuck options.

Versus peers: Moondrop Dusk (DSP) is warmer with bass that hits a bit harder, while Yu9 Que is the more neutral, reference-leaning take. Elysian Pilgrim offers smoother treble, but Yu9 Que counters with better bass grip, stage, and imaging. AFUL Performer 7 tilts mild V; choose it for extra mid-bass and forward treble, otherwise Yu9 Que wins on technicality. Mega 5 EST chases the meta target yet stumbles in bass/treble; NiceHCK Rockies refines that approach and might be the more exciting alternative if spending slightly more. Bottom line: the hype is justified—a superb all-rounder around $400 with only the cable begging for an upgrade. It’s a clear pick for neutral/reference fans, though those seeking more “fun” might look elsewhere; call it a pragmatic, two-star recommendation amid a crowded market and likely pre-order waits.


Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A Tech
Smooth listen, non-fatiguing, balanced and leans towards neutral, scales good, full, natural, but lacks dynamics/transients and vocal extension. Reminds me of the OG SA6 with a little more treble and low-end, but less mids, and even more pulled back vocals... Similar to the Meta tunings, reminds me of a more neutral Astral/Crescent/Horizon - Good, but a bit overhyped and priced a bit high for a 1DD+3BA, tech is slightly behind the Astrals and should be under $300 imo.
Youtube Video Summary

YU9 Que presents a balanced, almost neutral tuning with a tasteful touch of mid-bass for warmth and punch. Treble is clean and controlled—more clarity than “sizzle”—so detail comes through without harshness, while mids keep vocals natural rather than forward or thin. Technical performance sits in the “solid for the price” camp: separation and imaging are tidy, but not the kind of hyper-etched sparkle that chases wow factor.

In practice, it shines with slower pop, R&B, acoustic and vocal-centric tracks where its coherence and smoothness pay off; those seeking big sub-bass drama or ultra-aerated treble fireworks may find it a touch polite. Versus brighter, more contrasty sets, the Que trades spectacle for musicality and long-session comfort, making value hinge on whether a refined, low-fatigue signature is preferred over maximum excitement at the price point.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 7.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A- Tech
Exceptional tuning and treble refinement; sets the benchmark at $400.
Youtube Video Summary

Yu9’s Que lands as a “safer Annihilator”: a warmer, scaled-back take that pushes ample sub-bass while keeping the rest tastefully controlled. The low end feels liquidy and bouncy, underpinning an aggressive 1–3 kHz rise with a gentle 3–5 kHz taper, so vocals sit upfront and crisp yet remain remarkably smooth thanks to the extra low-end warmth. Treble is slightly scooped around 5–6 kHz and then climbs in small, well-placed peaks out to ~15–18 kHz, yielding excellent extension that feels on par with sets like Moondrop Variations in this range.

What makes it pop is the value proposition: at $400, the overall resolution, tonal balance, and staging read far pricier—more like the $700–800 bracket. With its engaging sub-bass lift, lucid mids, and airy yet controlled top end, Que comes off as a polished, crowd-friendly tuning that still excites detail chasers. If momentum holds, this looks like the next big thing around the $400 mark.

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

Yanyin Canon II User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Yu9 Que User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

8.5

Excellent

Yanyin Canon II Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.4

Gaming Grade

A-

Yu9 Que Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.8

Gaming Grade

A

Yanyin Canon II Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning lands in a pleasing sweet spot with mostly coherent frequency integration. Tonality stays consistent from track to track.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Yu9 Que Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • Tuning feels refined, blending frequencies with convincing realism and engagement. Transitions between registers feel effortless.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Overall technical control is strong, presenting instruments with clarity and sensible staging. Textures are portrayed with satisfying clarity.
Bass A+
You hear powerful yet disciplined low-end slam that extends effortlessly. It marries sub-bass depth with great texture.
Mids A+
The midrange sounds refined and revealing, balancing clarity with emotional weight. Timbre accuracy rivals studio monitors.
Treble A
Highs feel superbly executed, revealing micro-detail without hint of sibilance. Highs stay smooth even at volume.
Dynamics A
You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.
Soundstage A
You hear both the breadth and the altitude of the mix, anchored by accurate positional cues. Immersion improves across genres.
Details A
Resolution feels both high and relaxed, capturing nuance with ease. There's zero smearing even at high volume.
Imaging A
Depth mapping feels natural and accurate, supporting convincing immersion. Depth mapping feels precise and natural.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Yanyin Canon II User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Yu9 Que User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Endoki avatar Endoki
8.5

Tastefully tuned IEM. It gives some unique colorations to the sound, making vocals sound pretty crisp and clean but in a tasteful way. Add a very satisfying amount of bass (including mid-bass!). Treble is top-notch.

Tuning: S+ Tech: A+ Bass: S Mids: A+ Treble: S Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: B Details: A+ Imaging: A-
Pros
Tuning, especially bass and treble. But mids do not disappoint as well.
Cons
I wouldn't describe this as neutral or even reference sounding. Soundstage could be wider.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer