Yu9 Que VS Softears RSV MK II

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Yu9 Que and Softears RSV MK II use 1DD+3BA and 5BA driver setups respectively. Yu9 Que costs $409 while Softears RSV MK II costs $700. Softears RSV MK II is $291 more expensive. Both score 8.1 from reviewers. Yu9 Que carries a user score of 8.5. Yu9 Que has better mids with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Yu9 Que Softears RSV MK II
Bass 8.2 8.1
Mids 8.3 7.8
Treble 8 7.9
Details 7.8 7.9
Soundstage 8.1 8.1
Imaging 7.9 8
Dynamics 7.8 7.8
Tonality 8.3 8.4
Technicalities 8 7.9

Yu9 Que Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.1

Very Positive


Softears RSV MK II Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.1

Very Positive


Reviews Comparison

Yu9 Que reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 9.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Can lack that Jenesequa "it" factor.
Youtube Video Summary

The YU9 Que sports a premium, durable resin shell in pure black with a metallic-feeling faceplate and a comfortable design featuring an anti-tragus catch. While the build itself feels handsome and unique, the included cable is criticized as wimpy and unpleasant, with a strong suggestion to upgrade it. Accessories are deemed solid, including a nice selection of tips and a particularly praised case with a soft, luxurious interior.

Sonically, the YU9 Que earns immense praise for its exceptional tuning, described as clean, resolute, and non-fatiguing. It delivers strong, textured bass that avoids being overwhelming, coupled with extremely well-done upper mids. While not class-leading in technicalities like micro-detail or instrument separation, its tonal balance is considered sophisticated and reminiscent of far more expensive sets like the Annihilator, even surpassing the Monarch MKII in tuning preference. It's highlighted as a fantastic all-rounder with a smooth, agreeable signature suitable for long listening sessions.

Despite its modest single dynamic driver + 3BA configuration and $409 price point, the YU9 Que is declared a very special and unique IEM, worthy of the hype it received. The review concludes it's a price leader and a highly competent package from a small brand, offering outstanding value and a beautiful, well-executed design that makes it an easy recommendation for those seeking a smooth, non-fatiguing sound.

Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Softears RSV MK II reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.9 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
So Softears didn't forget how to tune. Tactful Basshead
Youtube Video Summary

Softears RSV MK2 takes the original’s idea and pushes it into a bolder, bass-centric direction. The compact shell is comfortably contoured, isolates well, and uses a slightly recessed 2-pin; the angular faceplate gives off an “evil Voltron” vibe in the best way. Packaging and accessories feel premium—a silky cable terminated in 4.4 mm with a matching 3.5 mm adapter, tip selection, cleaning tools—though the bundled case looks nice while feeling a bit faux-leather and questionable for durability. Under the hood is a 5-BA array around the ~$700 mark, presented with the fit and finish expected at this tier.

The tuning is unabashedly bass-heavy with a warmer rise through ~150–200 Hz and a slightly dark-leaning top end; not super airy, but undeniably full, rich, and musical. That weight can introduce occasional roughness/sibilance in certain vocals and can muddy spoken-word content, so this isn’t for everyone. Within Softears’ catalog it stands out: far more low-end than RSV (OG), Volume S, Twilight or Studio 4, and a different philosophy than Enigma’s vivid upper-mids. Versus sets like Monarch MK4, this goes for a deeper, thumpier shelf with a gentler upper air—trading a bit of “technical” sheen for tonal density and groove.

As a “tactfully executed bass-head” Softears, RSV MK2 delivers: impactful low end, natural mids, comfortable build, and a coherent, down-sloping balance that suits modern music exceptionally well. It isn’t flawless—moments of aggressiveness, plus a case that feels more pretty than tough—but the overall package is compelling. In the $400–$900 bracket it scores a 9.4 on this scale, while strong lower-priced options (e.g., bass-shelf specialists like Punch-tuned sets) may satisfy similar cravings if budget leads. For listeners craving a plush, powerful low end done with intent, this is a distinctive and deeply enjoyable take from Softears.

Mids: A- Treble: A+ Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: S-

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Softears RSV MK II or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $699

Buy Softears RSV MK II on Linsoul

Yu9 Que reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 8 Reviewer Score
Balanced, contrasty, highly resolving. Very good transients. Tight bass, clean mids, very well extended treble. The only glaring flaw is the one-dimensional imaging - there is very little layering, unfortunately which can make instruments and vocals sound like they're all standing in a straight line in front of you. Nonetheless, an excellent IEM!

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Softears RSV MK II reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 8 Reviewer Score

Yu9 Que reviewed by Fox Told Me So

Fox Told Me So 8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
YU9 Audio QUE is a $300 hybrid (1DD + 3BA) with a name rooted in Chinese culture—“阙” (QUE, palace), paired with a fish bone logo from “鱼” (YU, fish). Shells are aluminum with a sandblasted, wavy faceplate finish.

Tuning is clean, neutral, and slightly V-shaped: bass is tight, bouncy, and textured; mids sit slightly forward thanks to extra 700 Hz–2 kHz gain, giving vocals a bigger image; treble leans bright with a 4–5 kHz push for clarity, rolling off naturally rather than chasing EST-style air. Sibilance can appear (on “th” or “tsu”), but not harsh.

Stage favors width over depth—impressively wide at the price, with neat, well-ordered placement and strong separation. Resolution is crisp, background clean, every note clearly etched.

Fox Told Me So original ranking

Fox Told Me So Youtube Channel
Bass: A Mids: A Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A Imaging: A

Softears RSV MK II reviewed by Fox Told Me So

Fox Told Me So 7.8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
The RSV MK2 still follows Softears’ signature approach: an all-BA design, specifically, five-BA configuration. The “V” stands for both its five-driver layout and its bold carbon-fiber faceplate design.

On the graph, it diverges from JM-1 or Harman, choosing its own path. Sub-200 Hz is elevated, giving the bass notable weight and warmth, but also risking congestion. A dip between 200–600 Hz thins mids and robs some body from vocals and instruments, though it does clean up edges. Then comes a surprising 14 kHz BA-driven peak, adding air, shimmer, and openness—rare for an all-BA set!

In practice, bass hits with real presence for BA, punchy and convincing though not as deep as DD. Mids lean slightly thin, a bit lack of density, making instruments less woody. Treble is airy and crisp thanks to that 14k lift, but may edge bright for sensitive listeners. Stage favors forward bass and a sense of openness, though not massive in depth.

Verdict: It’s bassy, airy, and a touch thin in the middle—a distinct tuning philosophy that stands apart from the crowd.

Fox Told Me So original ranking

Fox Told Me So Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A Tech
Smooth listen, non-fatiguing, balanced and leans towards neutral, scales good, full, natural, but lacks dynamics/transients and vocal extension. Reminds me of the OG SA6 with a little more treble and low-end, but less mids, and even more pulled back vocals... Similar to the Meta tunings, reminds me of a more neutral Astral/Crescent/Horizon - Good, but a bit overhyped and priced a bit high for a 1DD+3BA, tech is slightly behind the Astrals and should be under $300 imo.
Youtube Video Summary

YU9 Que presents a balanced, almost neutral tuning with a tasteful touch of mid-bass for warmth and punch. Treble is clean and controlled—more clarity than “sizzle”—so detail comes through without harshness, while mids keep vocals natural rather than forward or thin. Technical performance sits in the “solid for the price” camp: separation and imaging are tidy, but not the kind of hyper-etched sparkle that chases wow factor.

In practice, it shines with slower pop, R&B, acoustic and vocal-centric tracks where its coherence and smoothness pay off; those seeking big sub-bass drama or ultra-aerated treble fireworks may find it a touch polite. Versus brighter, more contrasty sets, the Que trades spectacle for musicality and long-session comfort, making value hinge on whether a refined, low-fatigue signature is preferred over maximum excitement at the price point.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Softears RSV MK II reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 8 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A+ Tech
Bassy dynamic all-rounder with great low-end texture that slams hard with good note-weight/body. Slight Hype 4 upgrade. Treble is smooth, and vocals are well-tuned. Overall unboxing/accesories are great... just no ESTs at its price, I'd wait for sale.
Youtube Video Summary

Softears RSV MK2 shifts from the OG’s vocal-centric tilt into a bass-forward all-rounder. The sub-bass and mid-bass hit with real slam and weight, giving drums and bass guitars a satisfying, dynamic punch. Upper mids (3–6 kHz) are tamed to avoid shout, while a gentle 1–2 kHz rise keeps vocals open and natural—slightly less pushed than the original but still clear. Treble is smooth with decent air; not super sparkly and there’s no EST “sauce,” but it stays clean and non-fatiguing.

As a package, MK2’s standout is the low-end texture—thunderous yet controlled—making it one of the more engaging bassy sets under four figures. Technical performance is solid for the tier, though some rivals at lower prices bring more raw detail and EST extension. Build and accessories get a tasteful, modern refresh. For best balance, the stock tips work well; bass-boosting or treble-opening tips can shift it toward a more V-shape at the expense of overall smoothness.

On genre fit, MK2 shines with hip-hop, pop, EDM, and R&B, where its punch and warmth bring rhythms to life; for orchestral or leaner acoustic picks, the bass can edge forward depending on the mix. It scales to mid–high volumes nicely (around the 70–80 dB zone) without turning sharp. Compared with the OG RSV—now likely affected by a silent retune in recent units—the MK2 is the safer buy: less shout, more authority down low, and a broader all-rounder appeal. Recommended, especially if found below full MSRP, for listeners craving tasteful bass with natural mids and relaxed, smooth treble.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
4 community members have rated the YU9 Que at an average of 4.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Softears RSV MK II reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.3 * score rescaled + normalized
5 community members have rated the Softears RSV-MKII at an average of 4.4/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Yu9 Que reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8.3 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech

The YU9 Que is a hybrid IEM using 1 dynamic driver + 3 balanced armatures, positioned in the mid-upper price tier with an MSRP around $399. Retail listings confirm the configuration (10 mm LF DD with three Knowles BA units) and current pricing in USD and MYR, placing it among competitors that emphasize tonal refinement over sheer technical fireworks.

Community impressions describe a balanced/neutral tonality with a tasteful bass lift, smooth upper-mids that avoid glare, and treble that leans non-sibilant. Subjective reports on Head-Fi and Reddit consistently frame the Que as an all-rounder that favors coherence and long-term listenability over maximum micro-detail.

Technically, listeners note solid imaging and macrodynamics with competent detail retrieval, though not class-leading for the price. The manufacturer has also published frequency-response plots (IEC711 and BK5128 rigs), which aligns with the community’s take that the Que targets a broadly neutral/balanced signature rather than an aggressive V-shape. Overall value is credible at its MSRP if you prioritize tonal balance and comfort over ultra-analytical presentation.


Bass: A+ Mids: S- Treble: A+ Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Softears RSV MK II reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A Tech

The Softears RSV MK II refines the original RSV with an all-5BA design and a 4-way crossover, targeting a stable “reference sound” while improving driver control and airflow management. It’s easy to drive at 122 dB/Vrms, 7 Ω, and the build mixes medical-grade resin with CNC-milled aluminum and forged carbon for a robust, low-resonance shell; MSRP is $699.

On paper, the tuning remains neutral with a bass lift: dual Knowles CI22955 woofers aim to give BA-bass more texture and weight, an improved ED driver anchors clean mids, and a SWFK unit handles upper treble for a smoother, less fatiguing top end. Softears’ LRC network and dual pressure-relief approach target consistent FR and reduced ear pressure, which should aid long listening sessions and imaging stability.

Subjectively, this positions the RSV MK II as a coherent, midrange-centric set with tight, controlled low-end rather than maximal slam, and a smooth treble that trades sparkle for fatigue-free listening. Soundstage is moderately wide with tidy imaging; technicalities are competitive for the class but won’t chase ultra-etched detail specialists. Given the tuning goals and efficient drive requirements, value will appeal most to listeners prioritizing tonal accuracy and midrange timbre over sheer sub-bass impact or treble air.


Bass: A+ Mids: S- Treble: A Dynamics: A Soundstage: A Details: A Imaging: A+

Yu9 Que (more reviews)

Yu9 Que reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 8.7 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
S- Tuning
S- Tech
Polished, speaker-like tuning with tactile bass, clean extension and standout imaging makes it a class-leading $400 hybrid. Minor nitpicks: mids can edge forward, and it prefers a bit more volume and a secure fit. Polished, speaker-like balance with tactile bass, linear fatigue-free treble and excellent imaging for the price. Mids can sit a bit forward and the presentation benefits from higher volume and a deeper, secure fit.
Youtube Video Summary

At ~$400, YU9 Audio Que sets a new bar for the bracket: a 1DD+3BA hybrid with a modest bass shelf, slightly forward mids, and linear treble extension that sounds more speaker-like than typical IEMs. The presentation is exceptionally polished and quiet-backgrounded, yielding crisp separation, convincing imaging, and staging in depth, width, and height that resembles far pricier gear.

The low end brings tactile mid-bass impact with deep, controlled sub-bass, pairing naturally with that extended, peak-free top end; the result is a true playlist killer across EDM, rock, vocal, and classical. Nitpicks exist: mids can sit a touch forward depending on track and the set rewards a slightly higher volume and a secure, deeper fit, while V-shape fans may find it too boring.

Compared with favorites like Dusk, Cadenza 4, and Volume S, Que keeps their strengths but fixes common complaints by delivering fuller bass weight, cleaner openness, and more realistic attack and dynamics. It does not need giant-killer claims to stand out; at this price it is simply class-leading.

Bass: S- Mids: A+ Treble: S- Dynamics: S- Soundstage: S- Details: S- Imaging: S-

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
One of the most refined, fun, engaging, and technically capable IEMs for its price. Treble is very refined and surprisingly not fatiguing. Well-textured bass with strong physicality. Clear, vocals. Refined, non-fatiguing treble with plenty of extension. Class-leading detail and separation. Treble may be too much for some.
Youtube Video Summary

Build & accessories: a hybrid 1DD + 3BA set priced around $399 with a spacious zipper case, multiple silicone tips, pouches, cleaning cloth, and shirt clip. The faceplate’s wavy, stone-like texture looks premium, and the shells use a 2-pin connector. The downside is the stock cable: it’s springy, only in 4.4 mm, and feels below the tier. Fit is serviceable but not ideal—the shell isn’t the most ergonomic, the nozzle lacks a lip, and seating a deeper fit can take a moment; once set, stability is good and tips stayed secure in use.

Sound: this isn’t a “new-meta” curve; it’s a unique, lively tuning. Bass is punchy, dynamic, and highly textured—more physical in practice than the graph suggests, with excellent impact and kick-drum authority. An early rise after 1 kHz pushes vocals front and center for an intimate, engaging presentation without tipping into shout. Treble is refined, sparkly, and well-extended: it is a bright set but avoids harshness, peakiness, sibilance, and fatigue, delivering crisp cymbals and defined transients even for rock and metal at any volume. Technicalities are class-leading under $500 with standout detail retrieval and separation; the one wish is a larger soundstage.

Comparisons & verdict: the Elysian Apostle still wins on bass texture/impact, treble refinement, and overall resolution, but the Yu9 Que offers a convincing “Apostle flavor” at a lower price. Versus Elysian Pilgrim, the Que is fuller and bassier, while Pilgrim’s treble is tamer; versus Volume S, the Que is cleaner, brighter, more detailed as the Volume S trends warmer with more neutral treble; against Dusk DSP, Dusk sounds more natural/balanced but the Que feels more fun and technical. Recommended for those who crave clarity, sparkle, and engagement without fatigue; less ideal if treble-sensitive or preferring a warm, relaxed tonality, and worth demoing for comfort. A top contender and serious gatekeeper around $400—final rating: 4.5/5 with a strong recommendation.


Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 8 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
Rating: S- | Value: ⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮 | Comfort: 9 fun bass. referency midrange. excellent techs could be bright. cable is meh
Youtube Video Summary

Yu9 Que arrives with a surprisingly premium unboxing: a crush-resistant carrying case with plush padding, an IEM pouch, microfiber cloth, cable clip, and two ear-tip sets (standard silicone and more premium liquid silicone). A quirky 3D-printed nameplate with serial number and a faceplate etched in a topographic-map motif give it character. The shell is on the larger, wider side—comfortable for many, but small ears should test fit first. The stock cable is just okay (some memory, no chin slider), though it’s offered in 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm terminations.

Tonally, this is a neutral-reference set with a tasteful bass lift—clean impact without throwing off balance. Sub-bass has satisfying thump and texture, though bass-heads coming from sets like Kiwi Ears Punch may find it polite. The mids sit even and accurate—no “vocal magic,” yet clearly above average. Treble stretches well into the air with a touch of brightness that adds crispness and a slightly clinical edge, staying shy of fatiguing. Technical chops are the draw: a decently wide soundstage (roughly 3–4/5 by comparison), standout 3D imaging, and strong resolution/separation make it excellent for gaming—worthy of a two-controller nod—though ultimate detail still trails pricier kilobuck options.

Versus peers: Moondrop Dusk (DSP) is warmer with bass that hits a bit harder, while Yu9 Que is the more neutral, reference-leaning take. Elysian Pilgrim offers smoother treble, but Yu9 Que counters with better bass grip, stage, and imaging. AFUL Performer 7 tilts mild V; choose it for extra mid-bass and forward treble, otherwise Yu9 Que wins on technicality. Mega 5 EST chases the meta target yet stumbles in bass/treble; NiceHCK Rockies refines that approach and might be the more exciting alternative if spending slightly more. Bottom line: the hype is justified—a superb all-rounder around $400 with only the cable begging for an upgrade. It’s a clear pick for neutral/reference fans, though those seeking more “fun” might look elsewhere; call it a pragmatic, two-star recommendation amid a crowded market and likely pre-order waits.


Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 7.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A- Tech
Exceptional tuning and treble refinement; sets the benchmark at $400.
Youtube Video Summary

Yu9’s Que lands as a “safer Annihilator”: a warmer, scaled-back take that pushes ample sub-bass while keeping the rest tastefully controlled. The low end feels liquidy and bouncy, underpinning an aggressive 1–3 kHz rise with a gentle 3–5 kHz taper, so vocals sit upfront and crisp yet remain remarkably smooth thanks to the extra low-end warmth. Treble is slightly scooped around 5–6 kHz and then climbs in small, well-placed peaks out to ~15–18 kHz, yielding excellent extension that feels on par with sets like Moondrop Variations in this range.

What makes it pop is the value proposition: at $400, the overall resolution, tonal balance, and staging read far pricier—more like the $700–800 bracket. With its engaging sub-bass lift, lucid mids, and airy yet controlled top end, Que comes off as a polished, crowd-friendly tuning that still excites detail chasers. If momentum holds, this looks like the next big thing around the $400 mark.

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

Softears RSV MK II (more reviews)

Softears RSV MK II reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 9* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
Youtube Video Summary

The Softears RSV MK II is a 5BA set at $699 with a sleek, performance-driven look—carbon-fiber “V” and RS badge on the faceplate—paired to an ergonomic shell and fish-mouth nozzle that stays light and exceptionally comfortable over long sessions. The package is solid: a braided 4.4 cable (plus a 3.5 mm dongle), cleaning cloth, two pouches, and two sets of silicone tips; the only nitpick is wishing for a more premium carrying case at this price.

What sets RSV MK II apart is how a generous bass boost/extension coexists with top-tier imaging, separation, and layering. In Valorant, footsteps hit with extra energy and impact yet subtle cues—water steps, micro-movements—cut through even during Vandal spam and 5v5 ability chaos. In Battlefield the set is a standout for immersion (planes, tanks) while preserving precise gunfire placement and the light “clinks” that win fights. The latest mix in Apex plays to its strengths: thermites don’t mask light taps, elevation cues remain clear, slides and shield pops are easy to track; and in Call of Duty, airstrikes and mortar fire don’t swamp critical information. It’s scored as the lowest-priced S-tier on the WallHack-certified list—note the tonality skews a touch dark, so strict reference seekers may prefer something lighter, but for impactful low-end plus elite competitive clarity, RSV MK II is a killer pick.


Fresh Reviews original ranking

Fresh Reviews Youtube Channel

Softears RSV MK II reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized
A 5-BA successor that lands at $700, claims “re-engineered” BA bass, and feels like a welcome throwback to when high-end Chi-Fi wasn’t four figures. Build and fit are excellent with a rock-solid seal; the thick cable behaves well but annoyingly ships 4.4-only with a 3.5 mm pigtail. Tonally it’s essentially neutral up top with a big low-end shelf—treble is clean and non-fatiguing, imaging competent, and the bass is unusually physical for all-BA, though it can be inconsistent (and a bit tubby on bass-heavy mixes) versus a good DD. Net: a supremely competent, do-everything all-rounder that trades “wow” factor for balance—I prefer it over Dunu SA6 Mk II, see Symphonym Meteor and Moondrop S8 as taste-based alternatives, and I land at a solid 4/5.
Youtube Video Summary

Softears RSV MK II brings back the all-BA ethos at $700 with five armatures and a promise of “re-engineered BA bass.” Build and accessories feel premium (sleek shells, plush case), while the cable choice is quirky—4.4 mm only with a 3.5 mm pigtail. Fit is outstandingly secure and custom-like but on the larger side with a longer nozzle, so comfort depends on ear size. Softears’ Ultra Clear tips work well; the new metal-ring variant adds little beyond novelty.

On the graph, bass looks like gigabass, yet in ear it settles into a warm, weighty foundation without steamrolling the mids. The midrange follows a “new-meta neutral” tilt—fuller than Harman with forward upper-mids—while treble lands clean and sparkly without fatigue. Imaging is tidy rather than cavernous; separation and delineation are convincing, with the top end executed better than the bottom. BA bass here is among the more physical and satisfying of its kind, though tactility can be track-dependent and turn a bit tubby on very bass-heavy mixes.

Against peers, Symphonium Meteor sounds warmer and more “special” but less all-round; DUNU SA6 MK2 is more colored with janglier treble and the least convincing bass; 7th Acoustics Supernova trades warmth for vivid, bright-tilted imaging; Softears Studio 4 is lighter on bass and airier; and the old Moondrop S8 stays the lively, vocal-centric counterpoint. Net take: a supremely competent, character-light all-rounder that favors bass weight over panoramic staging. Verdict: 4/5 stars—a welcome throwback done right, and notably cheaper than the original RSV launch price.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Yu9 Que User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

8.5

Excellent

Softears RSV MK II User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Yu9 Que Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.9

Gaming Grade

A

Softears RSV MK II Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8.9

Gaming Grade

S-

Yu9 Que Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • Tuning feels refined, blending frequencies with convincing realism and engagement. Transitions between registers feel effortless.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • You get an articulate, polished performance with immersive stage depth and great control. There's a sense of polish across the whole spectrum.
Bass A+
You hear powerful yet disciplined low-end slam that extends effortlessly. It marries sub-bass depth with great texture.
Mids A+
The midrange sounds refined and revealing, balancing clarity with emotional weight. Timbre accuracy rivals studio monitors.
Treble A+
Treble reaches superb heights, offering effortless extension and crystal clarity. Every cymbal crash resolves into fine mist.
Dynamics A
You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.
Soundstage A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging that lets instruments float naturally around you. It paints a holographic bubble around you.
Details A
Resolution feels both high and relaxed, capturing nuance with ease. There's zero smearing even at high volume.
Imaging A
Depth mapping feels natural and accurate, supporting convincing immersion. Depth mapping feels precise and natural.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Softears RSV MK II Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • It delivers a coherent, natural timbre that remains captivating across genres. Acoustic instruments sound lifelike and textured.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Overall technical control is strong, presenting instruments with clarity and sensible staging. Textures are portrayed with satisfying clarity.
Bass A+
It delivers flagship-worthy bass, rich in both rumble and nuance. Reference tracks showcase its grip.
Mids A
Expect lifelike vocals and instruments with impressive nuance and realism. You can easily follow harmonies and backups.
Treble A
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics A
The system snaps into action with precision, highlighting every swell. Recordings feel energetic and alive.
Soundstage A+
A panoramic, wraparound presentation suspends each element in a convincingly airy bubble. Instruments float with pinpoint spacing.
Details A
Excellent detail retrieval that resolves intricacies without tipping into clinical territory. Tiny nuances jump out effortlessly.
Imaging A+
Movement flows gracefully, tracing arcs that are rendered with surgical accuracy. Movement effects are rendered with precision.
Gaming S-
Expansive soundstage with accurate directional cues. Handles complex audio landscapes while preserving important gameplay information. Premium pricing warrants consideration of gaming-first alternatives for lower cost

Yu9 Que User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Endoki avatar Endoki
8.5

Tastefully tuned IEM. It gives some unique colorations to the sound, making vocals sound pretty crisp and clean but in a tasteful way. Add a very satisfying amount of bass (including mid-bass!). Treble is top-notch.

Tuning: S+ Tech: A+ Bass: S Mids: A+ Treble: S Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: B Details: A+ Imaging: A-
Pros
Tuning, especially bass and treble. But mids do not disappoint as well.
Cons
I wouldn't describe this as neutral or even reference sounding. Soundstage could be wider.

Softears RSV MK II User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Softears RSV MK II or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $699

Buy Softears RSV MK II on Aliexpress

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer