64 Audio A2e - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (D Tier | 3.9/10)

Home Reviewer Paul Wasabii 64 Audio A2e

Summary

Based on 2 reviews, the 64 Audio A2e is getting lukewarm responses from reviewers, who note that it performs best with tempered expectations.

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

3.9

Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.5

Gaming Grade

D+

64 Audio A2e Details

Driver Configuration: 2BA

Tuning Type: V-Shaped

Top V-Shaped IEMs

Brand: 64 Audio Top 64 Audio IEMs

Price (Msrp): $700

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
A rather interesting "V-but-also-not" signature. Can get a little hot in the treble.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.2 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
D Tech
Bloated mid-bass and extremely dark upper-midrange and treble results in hazy, uninspired listen.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: C- Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

64 Audio A2e Infos

Discuss 64 Audio A2e with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "64 Audio A2e discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare 64 Audio A2e to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough 64 Audio A2e reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
64 Audio A2e vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better imaging, details and mids.
Show Softears RSV MK II
 8.1
64 Audio A2e vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show EPZ 530
 8
64 Audio A2e vs. ORIVETI OH700VB
ORIVETI OH700VB offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
Show ORIVETI OH700VB
 7.9
64 Audio A2e vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Thieaudio Oracle MKIII offers better details, mids and imaging.
Show Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
 7.8
64 Audio A2e vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Night Oblivion Butastur offers better imaging, mids and details.
Show Night Oblivion Butastur
 7.8
64 Audio A2e vs. Intuaura Purple
Similar overall performance.
Show Intuaura Purple
 7.8
64 Audio A2e vs. Aful Cantor
Aful Cantor offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Aful Cantor
 7.7
64 Audio A2e vs. Elysian Pilgrim Noir
Elysian Pilgrim Noir offers better mids, imaging and dynamics.
Show Elysian Pilgrim Noir
 7.6
64 Audio A2e vs. LetShuoer EJ07M
LetShuoer EJ07M offers better mids, details and imaging.
Show LetShuoer EJ07M
 7.6
64 Audio A2e vs. Moondrop S8
Moondrop S8 offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Moondrop S8
 7.6
Best IEMs from $600 - $1,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Tonality remains inconsistent, with uneven peaks and dips that disrupt musical flow. You'll constantly notice peaks or dips pulling focus.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Bass C-
It keeps the low end tidy, though energy and weight remain limited. It favors balance over excitement.
Mids D
The region feels unstable, alternating between honky resonance and missing information. You'll hear odd resonances across the mids.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics D
Volume shifts feel constrained, so build-ups plateau before releasing. Build-ups plateau before resolving.
Details D
Modest detail presentation that sacrifices texture and masks subtle nuances. It conveys the basics but not the nuance.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning that never quite nails the center image. Left/right cues exist but are rough.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer