64 Audio A2e [3.9/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for 64 Audio A2e

IEMRanking.com Home 64 Audio A2e
My Ranking My Favorites

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

3.9

Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.5

Gaming Grade

D+

64 Audio A2e Details

Driver Configuration: 2BA

Tuning Type: V-Shaped

Brand: 64 Audio Top 64 Audio IEMs

Price (Msrp): $700

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
A rather interesting "V-but-also-not" signature. Can get a little hot in the treble.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.2 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
D Tech
Bloated mid-bass and extremely dark upper-midrange and treble results in hazy, uninspired listen.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: C- Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

64 Audio A2e Infos

Compare 64 Audio A2e to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
64 Audio A2e vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better mids, dynamics and imaging.
Show Softears RSV MK II
 8.3
64 Audio A2e vs. Aful Cantor
Aful Cantor offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Aful Cantor
 7.8
64 Audio A2e vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Thieaudio Oracle MKIII offers better details, mids and imaging.
Show Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
 7.7
64 Audio A2e vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show EPZ 530
 7.7
64 Audio A2e vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Night Oblivion Butastur offers better imaging, mids and details.
Show Night Oblivion Butastur
 7.6
64 Audio A2e vs. Moondrop S8
Moondrop S8 offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Moondrop S8
 7.6
64 Audio A2e vs. Sennheiser IE600
Sennheiser IE600 offers better details, mids and imaging.
Show Sennheiser IE600
 7.5
64 Audio A2e vs. Letshuoer EJ07M
Letshuoer EJ07M offers better mids, details and imaging.
Show Letshuoer EJ07M
 7.5
64 Audio A2e vs. Softears RSV
Softears RSV offers better mids, treble and details.
Show Softears RSV
 7.4
64 Audio A2e vs. Elysian Pilgrim Noir
Elysian Pilgrim Noir offers better mids, imaging and dynamics.
Show Elysian Pilgrim Noir
 7.4
Best IEMs from $600 - $1,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer