64 Audio A3e - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 5.3/10)

Home 64 Audio A3e

Summary

Based on 1 review, the 64 Audio A3e is receiving steady, if unspectacular, approval from reviewers, highlighting its dependable nature.

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

5.3

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

64 Audio A3e Details

Driver Configuration: 3BA

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: 64 Audio Top 64 Audio IEMs

Price (Msrp): $500

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5.3 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
See A3t but with singificantly worse treble extension and technicalities.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: A- Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C+

64 Audio A3e Infos

Discuss 64 Audio A3e with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "64 Audio A3e discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare 64 Audio A3e to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough 64 Audio A3e reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
64 Audio A3e vs. Yu9 Que
Yu9 Que offers better treble, imaging and details.
Show Yu9 Que
 8.1
64 Audio A3e vs. Hisenior Mega5-EST
Hisenior Mega5-EST offers better treble, imaging and details.
Show Hisenior Mega5-EST
 8
64 Audio A3e vs. Nicehck Rockies
Nicehck Rockies offers better imaging, treble and details.
Show Nicehck Rockies
 8
64 Audio A3e vs. Xenns Top Pro
Xenns Top Pro offers better details, imaging and treble.
Show Xenns Top Pro
 7.9
64 Audio A3e vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Thieaudio Oracle MKIII offers better details, imaging and treble.
Show Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
 7.8
64 Audio A3e vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Night Oblivion Butastur offers better imaging, details and treble.
Show Night Oblivion Butastur
 7.8
64 Audio A3e vs. MYER-AUDIO SLIIVO SLT6
MYER-AUDIO SLIIVO SLT6 offers better imaging, details and treble.
Show MYER-AUDIO SLIIVO SLT6
 7.8
64 Audio A3e vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk offers better details, treble and imaging.
Show Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
 7.7
64 Audio A3e vs. Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch
Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch offers better imaging, details and dynamics.
Show Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch
 7.7
64 Audio A3e vs. Fiio FH19
Fiio FH19 offers better treble and dynamics.
Show Fiio FH19
 7.5
Best IEMs from $400 - $600

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Overall technicalities are acceptable, delivering enough clarity for casual sessions. Imaging is serviceable though not immersive.
Bass B
The bass brings healthy impact, complementing mixes without overpowering them. It keeps up with faster passages cleanly.
Mids A-
It delivers an excellent midrange that feels vibrant and true to life. It balances clarity with natural smoothness.
Treble C+
Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.
Dynamics C+
Expect solid impact overall, even if finer gradations feel a touch smoothed. Micro-details could still be sharper.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval that handles most textures while leaving some micro-information understated. Most textures come through cleanly.
Imaging C+
A stable phantom center appears, lending vocals a consistent anchor. It maintains a coherent phantom center.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer