64 Audio Aspire 2 [4.3/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for 64 Audio Aspire 2

IEMRanking.com Home 64 Audio Aspire 2

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

4.3

Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.5

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C Tech
Pretty warm and lo-res sounding overall.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: C- Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Super* Review

2025-07-20
Super* Review 4* * score normalized

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

64 Audio Aspire 2 Infos

Compare 64 Audio Aspire 2 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
64 Audio Aspire 2 vs. Yu9 Que
Yu9 Que offers better details, mids and bass.
8.2
64 Audio Aspire 2 vs. NiceHCK Rockies
NiceHCK Rockies offers better mids, bass and details.
8.1
64 Audio Aspire 2 vs. Hisenior Mega5-EST
Hisenior Mega5-EST offers better details, treble and bass.
7.9
64 Audio Aspire 2 vs. Xenns Top Pro
Xenns Top Pro offers better details, imaging and mids.
7.9
64 Audio Aspire 2 vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Thieaudio Oracle MKIII offers better details, mids and imaging.
7.7
64 Audio Aspire 2 vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk offers better details, treble and imaging.
7.7
64 Audio Aspire 2 vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Night Oblivion Butastur offers better details, imaging and bass.
7.6
64 Audio Aspire 2 vs. Moondrop Variations
Moondrop Variations offers better details, treble and bass.
7.5
64 Audio Aspire 2 vs. Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch
Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch offers better bass, treble and dynamics.
7.4
64 Audio Aspire 2 vs. Softears Studio 4
Softears Studio 4 offers better mids, treble and bass.
7.4
Best IEMs from $400 - $600

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Details C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer