64 Audio Aspire 3 - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (B Tier | 5.6/10)

IEMRanking.com Home 64 Audio Aspire 3
My Ranking My Favorites

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

5.6

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.7

Gaming Grade

C

64 Audio Aspire 3 Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: 64 Audio Top 64 Audio IEMs

Price (Msrp): $650

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

2025-07-20
Super* Review 6* * score normalized
Midrange is pretty flat. Nice flat midrange. Hefty but isolated bass boost.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5.1 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
A bit platicky overall - extends in the treble, but has some idiosyncrasies that contribute to the odd timbre/coherency.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: B

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

64 Audio Aspire 3 Infos

Compare 64 Audio Aspire 3 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
64 Audio Aspire 3 vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better mids, dynamics and bass.
Show Softears RSV MK II
 8.3
64 Audio Aspire 3 vs. Hisenior Mega5-EST
Hisenior Mega5-EST offers better treble, bass and mids.
Show Hisenior Mega5-EST
 7.9
64 Audio Aspire 3 vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Thieaudio Oracle MKIII offers better details, mids and bass.
Show Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
 7.7
64 Audio Aspire 3 vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show EPZ 530
 7.7
64 Audio Aspire 3 vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Night Oblivion Butastur offers better bass, mids and details.
Show Night Oblivion Butastur
 7.6
64 Audio Aspire 3 vs. Moondrop S8
Moondrop S8 offers better details, treble and mids.
Show Moondrop S8
 7.6
64 Audio Aspire 3 vs. Moondrop Variations
Moondrop Variations offers better treble, bass and details.
Show Moondrop Variations
 7.5
64 Audio Aspire 3 vs. Sennheiser IE600
Sennheiser IE600 offers better bass, details and mids.
Show Sennheiser IE600
 7.5
64 Audio Aspire 3 vs. Letshuoer EJ07M
Letshuoer EJ07M offers better bass, mids and details.
Show Letshuoer EJ07M
 7.5
64 Audio Aspire 3 vs. Softears RSV
Softears RSV offers better mids, treble and bass.
Show Softears RSV
 7.4
Best IEMs from $600 - $1,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer