64 Audio Fourte Blanc [6.2/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for 64 Audio Fourte Blanc

IEMRanking.com Home 64 Audio Fourte Blanc

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

6.2

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.6

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 6.4 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
A Tech
Quite detailed, but lots of uncanny valley in the midrange (sounds like singers are singing into a cup) and treble is contentiously bright.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: C- Treble: B Dynamics: A- Details: S Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score normalized

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

64 Audio Fourte Blanc Infos

Compare 64 Audio Fourte Blanc to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
64 Audio Fourte Blanc vs. Elysian Annihilator 2023
Elysian Annihilator 2023 offers better mids, treble and bass.
9
64 Audio Fourte Blanc vs. Softears Enigma
Softears Enigma offers better mids, treble and bass.
9
64 Audio Fourte Blanc vs. Elysian Annihilator 2021
Elysian Annihilator 2021 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
8.8
64 Audio Fourte Blanc vs. Canpur CP622B
Canpur CP622B offers better mids, treble and bass.
8.7
64 Audio Fourte Blanc vs. Campire Audio Clara Ti
Campire Audio Clara Ti offers better mids, treble and bass.
8.6
64 Audio Fourte Blanc vs. Forte Ears Macbeth
Forte Ears Macbeth offers better mids, treble and imaging.
8.5
64 Audio Fourte Blanc vs. Empire Ears Raven
Empire Ears Raven offers better mids, imaging and bass.
8.5
64 Audio Fourte Blanc vs. Kinera Imperial Loki
Kinera Imperial Loki offers better mids, bass and imaging.
8.5
64 Audio Fourte Blanc vs. 64 Audio Tia Trio
64 Audio Tia Trio offers better bass, mids and dynamics.
8.5
64 Audio Fourte Blanc vs. Astell&Kern x Empire Ears NOVUS
Astell&Kern x Empire Ears NOVUS offers better mids, bass and treble.
8.5
Best IEMs from $2,000 - $4,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Bass A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Details S
Reference-class detail: microscopic resolution with perfect texture reproduction. Nothing is lost, revealing the absolute truth of the recording.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer