64 Audio tia Fourte [6.2/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for 64 Audio tia Fourte

IEMRanking.com Home 64 Audio tia Fourte

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

6.2

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Precogvision 6.4 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Tia Trio's older brother that takes things too far off the beaten path for tonality.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: B Mids: C- Treble: C+ Dynamics: S Details: S Imaging: A-
Crin 6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
A Tech
Unique sound; high clarity and bass response with immensely wide staging, held back by a wonky tonality.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

64 Audio tia Fourte Infos

Compare 64 Audio tia Fourte to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
64 Audio tia Fourte vs. Elysian Annihilator 2023
Offers better treble, mids and bass.
9
64 Audio tia Fourte vs. Softears Enigma
Offers better mids, treble and bass.
9
64 Audio tia Fourte vs. Elysian Annihilator 2021
Offers better treble, mids and bass.
8.8
64 Audio tia Fourte vs. Canpur CP622B
Offers better mids, treble and bass.
8.7
64 Audio tia Fourte vs. Campire Audio Clara Ti
Offers better mids, treble and bass.
8.6
64 Audio tia Fourte vs. Forte Ears Macbeth
Offers better mids, treble and bass.
8.5
64 Audio tia Fourte vs. Kinera Imperial Loki
Offers better bass, mids and treble.
8.5
64 Audio tia Fourte vs. Empire Ears Raven
Offers better mids, bass and imaging.
8.5
64 Audio tia Fourte vs. 64 Audio Tia Trio
Offers better bass, mids and treble.
8.5
64 Audio tia Fourte vs. FATFreq Grand Maestro
Offers better mids, treble and bass.
8.4
Best IEMs from $2,000 - $4,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics S
Reference-class dynamics: perfect micro/macro contrast with lightning transients. Utterly realistic reproduction of musical energy.
Details S
Reference-class detail: microscopic resolution with perfect texture reproduction. Nothing is lost, revealing the absolute truth of the recording.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer