7Hz Timeless 2 [6.9/10]

Reviews (6), scores and comparisons for 7Hz Timeless 2

IEMRanking.com Home 7Hz Timeless 2

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Tim Tuned Gizaudio Axel
Jays Audio
Z-Reviews IEMRanking AI

Average Reviewer Score:

6.9

Cautiously Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

Reviews

Z-Reviews 8.5 * score normalized
Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Good all-rounder set with solid tech. Good variety with the nozzles that actually changes the sound. Treble is smoother than other planars, and not much "planar timbre".

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio
Tim Tuned 6.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A+ Tech
A good v-shape treble can be a bit too much

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
- Tim Tuned
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A-
Gizaudio Axel 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A- Tech
Sounds is identical to the Timeless OG. Clean, impactful bass, great detail, fast transients. Upper mids are a bit intense, bright treble, planar timbre.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel
Jaytiss 5.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
It's fine, but it's 230 dollars.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B

IEMRanking AI

2025-07-23
IEMRanking AI 8.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech

The 7Hz Timeless II updates its predecessor with a 14.5mm planar magnetic driver featuring a dual-sided silver alloy diaphragm and N52 magnets, offering improved responsiveness and reduced "planar timbre" compared to the original . Its standout feature is the four interchangeable nozzles, allowing tonal adjustments—though the bullet-shaped variants suffer from condensation issues and noticeably reduce treble clarity . Comfort is decent for medium-to-large ears, but the aluminum shells may challenge smaller anatomies, and isolation remains average despite a secure fit .

Tonally, the Timeless II leans neutral with a sub-bass lift, delivering fast, textured lows that avoid bleeding into the mids . Midrange clarity is strong but can edge into harshness with upper-mid-forward tracks, while treble extends well without excessive sibilance . Technically, it excels in imaging precision and soundstage width, though depth and height feel constrained next to hybrids like the Simgot ET142 .

Buy 7Hz Timeless 2 on Linsoul (affiliate)

- IEMRanking AI

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

7Hz Timeless 2 Infos

Compare 7Hz Timeless 2 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better dynamics, soundstage and treble.
7.7
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.6
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, soundstage and treble.
7.6
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics and soundstage.
7.4
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.3
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, soundstage and treble.
7.3
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better soundstage and dynamics.
7.3
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better dynamics and mids.
7.2
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey 2
Ziigaat Odyssey 2 offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
7.1
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews offers better dynamics and soundstage.
7.1
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer