7Hz Timeless 2 - Reviews & Ratings

6 Reviews (A Tier | 7.2/10)

Home 7Hz Timeless 2

Summary

Based on 6 reviews, the 7Hz Timeless 2 is earning strong approval from most reviewers, who appreciate its engaging character.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.2

Generally Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.4

Gaming Grade

A-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Timeless 2 shows up with a bigger, round shell (carbon-fiber face, metal rim), a nice hard case, and an oddball-but-cool ribbon cable on MMCX that feels a bit stiff. The real headline is the swappable nozzles: tiny side-vent “pin” nozzles (stock), a “flower” top-vent nozzle, and a large side-vent set. Tip pack is a colorful grab bag (no foams), and care is needed because narrow bores can block those side vents. Power isn’t a problem—this set is very efficient and plays happily from a phone or desktop amps without turning harsh.

Sonically, the three nozzles behave like three different tunings. The stock tiny side-vents are wide, chill, and distant—easy listening with big space. Swap to the “flower” top-vent and everything snaps into focus: detail rockets up, staging comes closer, and transients clean up without tipping into sibilance; bass also tightens and gains punch. The big side-vent option brings more bass weight and a huge stage, trading a bit of hyper-detail for scale and fun. Tip rolling matters: wide-bore silicone (e.g., Dunu SS) or high-seal foams can make it a party in the head, while tight-bore foams can choke the vents and thin the sound.

With the right nozzle/tip combo, Timeless 2 goes from “good planar” to aggressively engaging: thunderous taiko hits, breathing and string texture on acoustic tracks, and club-ready energy on electronic. It feels like the most complete planar IEM here—big soundstage, real bass presence, and crisp clarity that invites louder listening. If pricing sits around the speculated $260–$320 range, this could muscle aside a lot of sets under $500–$600. Verdict: a bold, successful experiment that delivers three flavors of planar goodness, with the “flower” nozzle as the standout for clarity + slam.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your 7Hz Timeless 2 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $229

Buy 7Hz Timeless 2 on Linsoul

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.3 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A- Tech
It's fine, but it's 230 dollars.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: A- Dynamics: B Soundstage: B

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Good all-rounder set with solid tech. Good variety with the nozzles that actually changes the sound. Treble is smoother than other planars, and not much "planar timbre".
Youtube Video Summary

7Hz Timeless 2 arrives as a polished successor to the original, delivering a smoother, more refined treble and a presentation that feels less “planar” in timbre. Its headline feature is the interchangeable nozzle system that meaningfully changes the sound—three distinct tunings rather than subtle tweaks—so fit and flavor are easier to dial in. Technicals remain solid for the class (layering, separation, staging), but the emphasis shifts from raw edge to easy, airy listenability; compared to brighter, snappier planars, this one trades a touch of bite for balance and comfort. Pairing with regular Sedna-style tips further smooths the top end without dulling it.

Midrange is handled with a calmer 2 kHz region, so vocals sound less forward and less shouty on energetic tracks. The silver nozzle tames that zone even more, appealing to listeners who prefer flatter upper-mids while adding a sense of openness and clarity. Bass is punchy, quick, and clean with good impact that avoids bleed; it won’t out-slam a strong dynamic-driver set, but the planar low-end here feels tight and versatile, fitting an all-rounder profile. If ultra-etched detail and hyper-tactile treble are the goal, some rivals push further; if the priority is smoothness without boredom, Timeless 2 hits the brief.

As a value play, sub-$100 options still undercut it, yet the combination of refinement + three nozzles makes Timeless 2 competitive at its price. Owners of recent planars may find it a side-grade in sheer technicals, but for anyone starting fresh—or seeking a safer, fuller tuning that scales reasonably—this is a confident recommendation. Use the smoothing tips and select the nozzle that fits the library, and it becomes a comfortable daily driver for most listeners.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 6.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A+ Tech
A good v-shape treble can be a bit too much

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A-

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A- Tech
Sounds is identical to the Timeless OG. Clean, impactful bass, great detail, fast transients. Upper mids are a bit intense, bright treble, planar timbre.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech

The 7Hz Timeless II updates its predecessor with a 14.5mm planar magnetic driver featuring a dual-sided silver alloy diaphragm and N52 magnets, offering improved responsiveness and reduced "planar timbre" compared to the original . Its standout feature is the four interchangeable nozzles, allowing tonal adjustments—though the bullet-shaped variants suffer from condensation issues and noticeably reduce treble clarity . Comfort is decent for medium-to-large ears, but the aluminum shells may challenge smaller anatomies, and isolation remains average despite a secure fit .

Tonally, the Timeless II leans neutral with a sub-bass lift, delivering fast, textured lows that avoid bleeding into the mids . Midrange clarity is strong but can edge into harshness with upper-mid-forward tracks, while treble extends well without excessive sibilance . Technically, it excels in imaging precision and soundstage width, though depth and height feel constrained next to hybrids like the Simgot ET142 .


Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

7Hz Timeless 2 Infos

Discuss 7Hz Timeless 2 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "7Hz Timeless 2 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare 7Hz Timeless 2 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better soundstage, mids and dynamics.
7.7
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better soundstage, dynamics and mids.
7.7
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
7.5
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics and soundstage.
7.5
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
7.4
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 4
Letshuoer Cadenza 4 offers better soundstage.
7.4
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews offers better soundstage and dynamics.
7.4
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics and soundstage.
7.4
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Crinear Meta
Crinear Meta offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.3
7Hz Timeless 2 vs. Hidizs MP145
Hidizs MP145 offers better dynamics and soundstage.
7.3
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Overall technical control is strong, presenting instruments with clarity and sensible staging. Textures are portrayed with satisfying clarity.
Bass A+
You hear powerful yet disciplined low-end slam that extends effortlessly. It marries sub-bass depth with great texture.
Mids A-
The mid band shines with organic tone and finely rendered textures. Long sessions remain fatigue-free.
Treble A-
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics B
It handles shifts in volume well, keeping transients lively and controlled. Quiet-to-loud transitions feel natural.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Buy

Footer