7Hz Timeless AE [6.2/10]
Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for 7Hz Timeless AE
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.2Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.7Gaming Grade
B+7Hz Timeless AE Details
Driver Configuration: 1Planar
Tuning Type: Neutral with bass boost
Brand: 7Hz Top 7Hz IEMs
Price (Msrp): $259.99
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Tim Tuned
6
Reviewer Score
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Nymz
5.3
Reviewer Score
Reviewed by: IEMRanking AI
2025-07-23
7.2
Reviewer Score
The 7Hz Timeless AE delivers a bass-forward tuning with a noticeable 2–3 dB lift in the low end compared to the original Timeless, giving tracks more rumble without feeling overblown . This added weight in the subbass enhances modern genres and gaming audio, though some complex drum passages may sound a bit muddier than on the original .
In the mids and treble, the AE retains strong clarity and transparency—vocals and guitars are well defined and not overshadowed by the bass, and cymbals remain clean without harsh peaks . Measurements show a smoother upper-mid response than the OG model, which helps tame some of its jaggedness . Imaging is detailed, and the soundstage feels spacious—especially for an IEM.
If you prioritize bass and impact, the AE delivers a more engaging listen than the original, but that comes with a slight trade‑off in bass tightness and technical precision . Build quality, modular cable design, and comfort are carried over intact. While not a revolutionary upgrade, the AE remains a worthy choice if you want more bass impact from the beloved planar platform.
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new7Hz Timeless AE Infos
Compare 7Hz Timeless AE to popular alternatives
VS
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
7Hz Timeless AE vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better imaging, details and mids.
|
7.7 |
|
7Hz Timeless AE vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, details and mids.
|
7.6 |
|
7Hz Timeless AE vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.6 |
|
7Hz Timeless AE vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.5 |
|
7Hz Timeless AE vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better imaging, details and mids.
|
7.4 |
|
7Hz Timeless AE vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Similar overall performance.
|
7.4 |
|
7Hz Timeless AE vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better imaging, mids and treble.
|
7.3 |
|
7Hz Timeless AE vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Similar overall performance.
|
7.3 |
|
7Hz Timeless AE vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids.
|
7.2 |
|
7Hz Timeless AE vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
Similar overall performance.
|
7.1 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review