AKG Phone Buds - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (D Tier | 3.3/10)

Home AKG Phone Buds

Summary

Based on 1 review, the AKG Phone Buds is getting lukewarm responses from reviewers, who note that it performs best with tempered expectations.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

3.3

Very Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.6

Gaming Grade

D+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D+ Tech
Surprisingly well extended in the treble. Somewhat anemic.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: C- Dynamics: D Details: C- Imaging: C-

AKG Phone Buds Infos

Discuss AKG Phone Buds with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "AKG Phone Buds discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Bass D
Bass remains light-handed, hinting at rumble without delivering real weight. It keeps out of the way but never excites.
Mids D
Midrange is highly uneven, veering between shouty peaks and hollow dips. Tonality swings between shouty and withdrawn.
Treble C-
Highs are present enough yet carry a bit of grain and splash. Busy mixes can still feel a bit splashy.
Dynamics D
Dynamics sound noticeably compressed, muting contrast between quiet and loud. Transients feel blunted and slow.
Details C-
You get the outline of textures, though the finer brushstrokes remain faint. Background information is audible but soft.
Imaging C-
Center information lands in the right area but not with laser focus. Separation is adequate for casual listening.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer