Alpha Omega Fulgrim [8.4/10]

Reviews (1), scores and comparisons for Alpha Omega Fulgrim

IEMRanking.com Home Ranking Alpha Omega Fulgrim

Average Reviewer Scores

Smirk Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

8.4

Very Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.9

Gaming Grade

B+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 8.4 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech
Elevated, bouncy, and dynamic bass. Somewhat normal sounding midrange and highs; pleasant for sure, if somewhat boring. Overall good set with a questionable price tag. Cons: Poor price-to-performance ratio.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: S Mids: A+ Treble: S- Dynamics: S- Details: S- Imaging: A+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Alpha Omega Fulgrim Infos

Compare Alpha Omega Fulgrim to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Alpha Omega Fulgrim vs. PMG Audio Apx SE
PMG Audio Apx SE offers better details, imaging and mids.
9.1
Alpha Omega Fulgrim vs. Subtonic STORM
Subtonic STORM offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
9.1
Alpha Omega Fulgrim vs. Softears Enigma
Softears Enigma offers better imaging, mids and details.
9
Alpha Omega Fulgrim vs. Elysian Annihilator 2021
Elysian Annihilator 2021 offers better treble, details and dynamics.
8.8
Alpha Omega Fulgrim vs. Unique Melody Mason FS Soleil Tomb
Unique Melody Mason FS Soleil Tomb offers better mids, details and imaging.
8.8
Alpha Omega Fulgrim vs. Canpur CP622B
Canpur CP622B offers better imaging, mids and details.
8.7
Alpha Omega Fulgrim vs. Empire Ears Raven
Empire Ears Raven offers better imaging and details.
8.5
Alpha Omega Fulgrim vs. Forte Ears Macbeth
Forte Ears Macbeth offers better imaging and details.
8.5
Alpha Omega Fulgrim vs. Astell&Kern x Empire Ears NOVUS
Astell&Kern x Empire Ears NOVUS offers better imaging.
8.5
Alpha Omega Fulgrim vs. Aroma Jewel
Aroma Jewel offers better imaging and details.
8.3
Best IEMs from above $4,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S-
  • Highly polished technical execution. Excellent frequency synergy creates an immersive experience. Enhances musical content.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • Very competent with articulate presentation. Well-defined layers and precise imaging. Soundstage is immersive and handles dynamics well.
Bass S
World-class bass performance. Perfectly balanced between visceral impact, texture, and depth with zero bleed into mids.
Mids A+
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble S-
Superb treble: effortless extension with crystal clarity. Perfect balance of sparkle and smoothness with exceptional detail.
Dynamics S-
Superb dynamic range - powerful yet nuanced. Exceptional transient response with lifelike impact and subtle volume gradations.
Details S-
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers. Retrieves even the most minute details while maintaining natural timbre.
Imaging A+
Exceptional imaging with holographic precision. Creates a palpable sense of physical placement with perfect positional stability.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer