AME Mousa - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (A Tier | 8.2/10)

Home AME Mousa

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the AME Mousa is celebrated for its quality by reviewers, who describe it as a confident, high-level performer.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.2

Very Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.8

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 8.2 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
S- Tech
Cons: Price, bass bloat.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A Dynamics: S- Details: S- Imaging: S-

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
Energetic Bassy fun set, but so excellent.
Youtube Video Summary

AME Mousa goes all-in on extravagance: a 15-driver array (BA stack plus two bone conductors) in a massive, impeccably finished shell with a faceplate that hints at Damascus-steel swirls. The $4,500 package feels ultra-premium—weighty presentation box, desk display case, metal tip cards (fancy but a bit fiddly), and a tidy stock cable that looks good yet lacks a chin slider. Fit will depend on ear size: the shells are very thick and heavy, though ergonomics and finish are smooth. Overall unboxing and build scream luxury.

Sonically it hits a warm, energizing V-shape with impactful bass, dynamic highs, and full-bodied vocals; sibilance is minimal and the set shines at higher volumes. Tuning isn’t neutral—expect a 1 kHz dip and lively 4–6 kHz energy—so it thrills more than it analyzes, and can edge toward fatigue over marathon sessions. Versus peers, it feels richer and more rambunctious than neutral “meta-target” options (think Storm/K4 style sets), less air-starved than darker tunings like CP622B, and more bass-driven than something like Annihilator while not as modular or chameleon-like as Grand Maestro. The takeaway: a specialist, endgame-flavored IEM for listeners chasing slam, note-weight, and engagement over strict neutrality—highly enjoyable if the price and shell size aren’t deal-breakers, and best auditioned first given its bold fit and flavor.

Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: S Soundstage: A-

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
12 community members have rated the AME Mousa at an average of 4.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

AME Mousa Infos

Discuss AME Mousa with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "AME Mousa discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare AME Mousa to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough AME Mousa reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
AME Mousa vs. Subtonic STORM
Subtonic STORM offers better soundstage, treble and mids.
9.2
AME Mousa vs. Softears Enigma
Softears Enigma offers better treble, soundstage and mids.
9
AME Mousa vs. Elysian Annihilator 2023
Elysian Annihilator 2023 offers better treble, soundstage and mids.
9
AME Mousa vs. Fort Ears Mefisto
Fort Ears Mefisto offers better treble and mids.
9
AME Mousa vs. PMG Audio Apx SE
PMG Audio Apx SE offers better treble, mids and bass.
8.9
AME Mousa vs. Elysian Annihilator 2021
Elysian Annihilator 2021 offers better treble, soundstage and details.
8.9
AME Mousa vs. Canpur CP622B
Canpur CP622B offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
8.8
AME Mousa vs. 7th Acoustics Asteria
7th Acoustics Asteria offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
8.8
AME Mousa vs. Unique Melody Mason FS Soleil Tomb
Unique Melody Mason FS Soleil Tomb offers better mids, treble and details.
8.7
AME Mousa vs. Empire Ears Raven
Empire Ears Raven offers better mids, details and imaging.
8.6
Best IEMs from above $4,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Tuning lands in a pleasing sweet spot with mostly coherent frequency integration. Tonality stays consistent from track to track.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • The presentation feels orderly, balancing workable detail retrieval with acceptable imaging cues. It keeps momentum without smearing transients.
Bass A+
You hear powerful yet disciplined low-end slam that extends effortlessly. It marries sub-bass depth with great texture.
Mids A-
It delivers an excellent midrange that feels vibrant and true to life. It balances clarity with natural smoothness.
Treble B+
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics S-
The presentation feels expansive, letting micro and macro dynamics breathe. There's a sense of limitless headroom.
Soundstage A-
You hear both the breadth and the altitude of the mix, anchored by accurate positional cues. Immersion improves across genres.
Details S-
Complex productions unravel completely, letting you examine every thread. Textures are rendered with exquisite finesse.
Imaging S-
Even dense mixes remain locked in place, reinforcing the illusion of physical performers. The stage remains stable regardless of complexity.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer