Audio Lokahi [5.8/10]
Reviews (6), scores and comparisons for Audio Lokahi
IEMRanking.com
Home
Audio Lokahi
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.8Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.4Gaming Grade
C+Audio Lokahi Details
Driver Configuration: 7BA
Tuning Type: V-shape
Price (Msrp): $240
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Audionotions
7
Reviewer Score
Very energetic tuning with excellent bass. Vaguely reminiscent of Hekili but better, in my opinion. Shares the same Foster DD as Gaea - very quick and snappy and impactful. Previously Owned
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
6.3
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
B+
Tech
Comment: Hard to find.
Balanced sounding
Limited by soundstage and imaging
Bass: B
Mids: B-
Treble: B+
Soundstage: B+
Details: A-
Imaging: B+
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Precogvision
5.6
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
C+
Tech
Airy and "raw" presentation that could use some technical refinement.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: B
Treble: B
Dynamics: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Reviewed by: Crin
5.5
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
C+
Tech
Reviewed by: Nymz
4.4
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C-
Tech
Great full BA experience for the price. Good tuning but treble can get hot. BA timbre and suction are the problem here. I really liked this for the price and easy rec if you can get it for the original price.
Bass: C-
Mids: C+
Treble: C-
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Audio Lokahi Infos
Compare Audio Lokahi to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Audio Lokahi vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better bass, dynamics and mids.
|
7.7 |
|
Audio Lokahi vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
Audio Lokahi vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better bass, dynamics and details.
|
7.6 |
|
Audio Lokahi vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better bass, dynamics and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Audio Lokahi vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
Audio Lokahi vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.3 |
|
Audio Lokahi vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better dynamics and soundstage.
|
7.3 |
|
Audio Lokahi vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better bass, dynamics and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
Audio Lokahi vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better bass, mids and dynamics.
|
7.2 |
|
Audio Lokahi vs. TANCHJIM x Effect Audio Force
TANCHJIM x Effect Audio Force offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.1 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B-- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage
B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review