IEMRanking.com
Home
Audiosense DT600
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.2Mixed to Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.4Gaming Grade
C+Audiosense DT600 Details
Driver Configuration: 6BA
Tuning Type: Neutral with bass boost
Brand: Audiosense Top Audiosense IEMs
Price (Msrp): $250
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Crin
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
Comment: It's hard to really recommend this.
Good technicalities, decent tuning with subbass boost
Bass: B
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Soundstage: B+
Details: A-
Imaging: B
Reviewed by: Nymz
Monarch tuning on a BA set that needs adapters (30ohms) and mods. Mids are very recessed. I didn't liked it. Stay away from 80ohms/Stock. Some BA timbre.
Bass: C-
Mids: D
Treble: D
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Audiosense DT600 Infos
Compare Audiosense DT600 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Audiosense DT600 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.7 |
Audiosense DT600 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, imaging and treble.
|
7.6 |
Audiosense DT600 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.6 |
Audiosense DT600 vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
Audiosense DT600 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.5 |
Audiosense DT600 vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.4 |
Audiosense DT600 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.4 |
Audiosense DT600 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.4 |
Audiosense DT600 vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.3 |
Audiosense DT600 vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.3 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage
B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review