IEMRanking.com
Home
AudioSense T800
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.9Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.9Gaming Grade
D+AudioSense T800 Details
Driver Configuration: 8BA
Tuning Type: V-Shaped
Brand: Audiosense Top Audiosense IEMs
Price (Msrp): $300
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Crin
Generic tuning that's nothing special in terms of tonal accuracy nor technicalities.
Crin Youtube Channel
Crin Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Precogvision
Bassy and has a hole in the lower-treble. Generally somewhat wonky all-round.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: C-
Treble: D
Dynamics: D
Details: D
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
AudioSense T800 Infos
Compare AudioSense T800 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
AudioSense T800 vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.8 |
AudioSense T800 vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7.7 |
AudioSense T800 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, details and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
AudioSense T800 vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7.5 |
AudioSense T800 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
|
7.5 |
AudioSense T800 vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
|
7.5 |
AudioSense T800 vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better details, imaging and treble.
|
7.4 |
AudioSense T800 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.4 |
AudioSense T800 vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better treble, details and imaging.
|
7.3 |
AudioSense T800 vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.3 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D+- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details
D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming
D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review