AudioSense T800 [3.9/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for AudioSense T800

IEMRanking.com Home AudioSense T800

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

3.9

Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.9

Gaming Grade

D+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C Tech
Generic tuning that's nothing special in terms of tonal accuracy nor technicalities.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.2 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
D Tech
Bassy and has a hole in the lower-treble. Generally somewhat wonky all-round.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

AudioSense T800 Infos

Compare AudioSense T800 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
AudioSense T800 vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
7.8
AudioSense T800 vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better treble, bass and mids.
7.7
AudioSense T800 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, details and dynamics.
7.6
AudioSense T800 vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better treble, bass and mids.
7.5
AudioSense T800 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
7.5
AudioSense T800 vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
7.5
AudioSense T800 vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better details, imaging and treble.
7.4
AudioSense T800 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.4
AudioSense T800 vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better treble, details and imaging.
7.3
AudioSense T800 vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.3
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer