AudioSense T800 - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (C Tier | 5.4/10)

Home AudioSense T800

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the AudioSense T800 is a sensible option among reviewers, especially for listeners seeking balance without drama.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.4

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.9

Gaming Grade

D+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C Tech
Generic tuning that's nothing special in terms of tonal accuracy nor technicalities.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.2 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
D Tech
Bassy and has a hole in the lower-treble. Generally somewhat wonky all-round.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the Audiosense T800 at an average of 4.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

AudioSense T800 Infos

Discuss AudioSense T800 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "AudioSense T800 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare AudioSense T800 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough AudioSense T800 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
AudioSense T800 vs. Ziigaat Horizon
Ziigaat Horizon offers better treble, imaging and details.
7.9
AudioSense T800 vs. Nice HCK Himalaya
Nice HCK Himalaya offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
7.8
AudioSense T800 vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better treble, bass and mids.
7.8
AudioSense T800 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, details and dynamics.
7.7
AudioSense T800 vs. Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua offers better details, imaging and treble.
7.7
AudioSense T800 vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
7.7
AudioSense T800 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
7.6
AudioSense T800 vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
7.6
AudioSense T800 vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better treble, bass and mids.
7.5
AudioSense T800 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
7.5
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • Resolution is limited, masking finer nuances and narrowing the soundstage. Busy mixes still overwhelm it with ease.
Bass C-
Bass stays subdued, content to hover in the background. It keeps things tidy, yet unremarkable.
Mids C-
The mids sound serviceable but rough around the edges, needing polish. Occasional glare can creep into upper mids.
Treble D
Treble balance wavers, creating a mix of recessed detail and harsh flashes. Highs feel restless and unfocused.
Dynamics D
The presentation feels restrained, with transients arriving blunted and slow. Rhythms lack the expected drive.
Details D
It can follow the main lines but loses composure once arrangements become busy. Fine articulation is frequently glossed over.
Imaging D
It sketches positions loosely while allowing outlines to blur. Instrument outlines remain fuzzy.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer