Bose QuietComfort Buds - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (C Tier | 4.4/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
Bose QuietComfort Buds
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.4Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.5Gaming Grade
CBose QuietComfort Buds Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $300
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Precogvision
4.4
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C-
Tech
Nice bass shelf, but dull sound signature due to upper-midrange being shelved and treble generally rolling-off.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B
Mids: C+
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C-
Details: C-
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Bose QuietComfort Buds Infos
Compare Bose QuietComfort Buds to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Bose QuietComfort Buds vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.8 |
|
Bose QuietComfort Buds vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better treble, mids and details.
|
7.7 |
|
Bose QuietComfort Buds vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
Bose QuietComfort Buds vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better details, dynamics and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Bose QuietComfort Buds vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7.5 |
|
Bose QuietComfort Buds vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Bose QuietComfort Buds vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
|
7.5 |
|
Bose QuietComfort Buds vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better details, treble and imaging.
|
7.4 |
|
Bose QuietComfort Buds vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.4 |
|
Bose QuietComfort Buds vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details
C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review