BQEYZ Autumn - Reviews & Ratings

7 Reviews (B Tier | 5.8/10)

Home BQEYZ Autumn

Summary

Based on 7 reviews, the BQEYZ Autumn is a sensible option among reviewers, especially for listeners seeking balance without drama.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.6

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
Comment: BQEYZ's best offering from their seasons lineup. Well tuned set with filters that actually work, solid bass response Midrange is borderline boring

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: B Treble: B Soundstage: B+ Details: A- Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C Tech

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.2 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
Slightly sharp around 3-5kHz, but decent enough otherwise. Cool magnet filter system, bass filters sound best.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: C- Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 2.8 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
D Tech
Ranked with Treble magnet. 4-5k still not perfect but fine. Stage is small and has no depth. Great bass extension. I can't rec it stock at this point with all the competition.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: E+ Treble: E+ Details: C- Imaging: E+

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.3 * score rescaled + normalized
31 community members have rated the BQEYZ Autumn at an average of 4.4/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

BQEYZ Autumn Infos

Discuss BQEYZ Autumn with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "BQEYZ Autumn discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare BQEYZ Autumn to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.7
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.7
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Letshuoer S12 Ultra
Letshuoer S12 Ultra offers better treble, details and dynamics.
7.6
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
7.5
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
7.4
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Crinear Daybreak
Crinear Daybreak offers better mids, dynamics and imaging.
7.3
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Hidizs MP145
Hidizs MP145 offers better dynamics, details and mids.
7.3
BQEYZ Autumn vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.3
BQEYZ Autumn vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better mids, imaging and treble.
7.2
BQEYZ Autumn vs. FatFreq x HBB Deuce
FatFreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
7.2
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass C+
Low-end delivery feels competent yet unremarkable, keeping a safe profile. Low-end bloom is kept in check.
Mids C-
Expect adequate midrange presence with a touch of grit and unevenness. Textures smear when the mix gets busy.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C-
It maintains a steady dynamic profile that neither offends nor inspires. Swells arrive but lack drama.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.
Details C+
Plenty of nuance surfaces, just not the last layer of shimmer. It balances clarity with an easygoing tone.
Imaging C
You can tell where things generally sit, though exact locations feel blurred. Center vocals sit mostly where expected.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer