BQEYZ Autumn [5.4/10]
Reviews (6), scores and comparisons for BQEYZ Autumn
IEMRanking.com
Home
BQEYZ Autumn
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.4Mixed to Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.6Gaming Grade
CBQEYZ Autumn Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: V-shape
Brand: BQEYZ Top BQEYZ IEMs
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Z-Reviews
8.5
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
6.4
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
B+
Tech
Comment: BQEYZ's best offering from their seasons lineup.
Well tuned set with filters that actually work, solid bass response
Midrange is borderline boring
Bass: B
Mids: B
Treble: B
Soundstage: B+
Details: A-
Imaging: A-
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Crin
4.5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C
Tech
Reviewed by: Precogvision
4.2
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C-
Tech
Slightly sharp around 3-5kHz, but decent enough otherwise. Cool magnet filter system, bass filters sound best.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: C-
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C-
Details: C-
Imaging: C+
Reviewed by: Nymz
2.8
Reviewer Score
D-
Tuning
D
Tech
Ranked with Treble magnet. 4-5k still not perfect but fine. Stage is small and has no depth. Great bass extension. I can't rec it stock at this point with all the competition.
Bass: C-
Mids: E+
Treble: E+
Details: C-
Imaging: E+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
BQEYZ Autumn Infos
Compare BQEYZ Autumn to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.7 |
|
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
|
7.6 |
|
BQEYZ Autumn vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better mids, dynamics and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
BQEYZ Autumn vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, bass and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
BQEYZ Autumn vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
|
7.2 |
|
BQEYZ Autumn vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7 |
|
BQEYZ Autumn vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
|
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7 |
|
BQEYZ Autumn vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage
B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review