Campfire Honeydew - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (E Tier | 2.4/10)

Home Campfire Honeydew

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the Campfire Honeydew is earning disappointing impressions from reviewers, who often describe it as underwhelming.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

2.4

Very Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.6

Gaming Grade

D-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 2.5 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
D Tech
Bloated bass, recessed upper-mids, generally off-tone, and simply lacking surface-level detailing.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 2.5 Reviewer Score
E Tuning
D Tech
Comment: Cute name but the sound isn't cute at all. Just no Midrange non existent

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: E+ Mids: E- Treble: E+ Soundstage: D Details: D Imaging: C-

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 2.1 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E+ Tech
Campfire's latest (and worst) bloated nightmare.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: E+ Treble: E+ Dynamics: E+ Details: E+ Imaging: E+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Campfire Honeydew Infos

Discuss Campfire Honeydew with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Campfire Honeydew discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Campfire Honeydew to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Campfire Honeydew reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Campfire Honeydew vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, dynamics and details.
7.7
Campfire Honeydew vs. Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua offers better mids, details and treble.
7.7
Campfire Honeydew vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and bass.
7.7
Campfire Honeydew vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
7.7
Campfire Honeydew vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.7
Campfire Honeydew vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better mids, dynamics and bass.
7.6
Campfire Honeydew vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
7.5
Campfire Honeydew vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
7.4
Campfire Honeydew vs. INTUAURA Balance
INTUAURA Balance offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.4
Campfire Honeydew vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 4
Letshuoer Cadenza 4 offers better mids, treble and details.
7.4
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • Tuning is chaotic and fatiguing, with clashing frequencies that make long sessions unbearable. Every song demands frequent volume adjustments.

Average Technical Grade

D-
  • Instrument separation collapses instantly, burying nuances and leaving everything in a gray blur. Layered arrangements collapse into a messy haze.
Bass D-
Bass comes across thin, offering little body or resonance. Kick drums sound papery and restrained.
Mids E
Critical mid frequencies hide in the background, making lyrics hard to catch. Guitars and pianos lose their presence.
Treble E+
The upper end is cloaked, leaving cymbals lacking shimmer and air. Overtones hide behind the midrange.
Dynamics E+
Expect constrained dynamics that blur the edges of quieter details. It struggles to render sudden changes.
Soundstage D
Depth collapses quickly, so even with stereo cues the scene feels cramped and two-tiered. It feels constrained even with live tracks.
Details D-
Definition suffers, causing supporting instruments to meld into a shapeless backing track. Backing vocals dissolve into the mix.
Imaging D
Panning effects blur at the edges, making movement sound smeared. Fast panning effects smear noticeably.
Gaming D-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer