Campfire IO - Reviews & Ratings
2 Reviews (D Tier | 2.7/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
Campfire IO
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
2.7Very Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.8Gaming Grade
D+Campfire IO Details
Driver Configuration: 2BA
Tuning Type: "Balanced"
Brand: Campfire Top Campfire IEMs
Price (Msrp): $300
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
3.9
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
C
Tech
Just no
Tuning is so questionable that you wonder how it passed QC
Bass: D
Mids: D
Treble: D
Soundstage: C-
Details: B-
Imaging: C+
Reviewed by: Crin
1.5
Reviewer Score
E
Tuning
C-
Tech
Tonality and timbre is all sorts of wrong. Lacks the technicalities to redeem it.
Crin Youtube Channel
Crin Youtube Channel
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Campfire IO Infos
Compare Campfire IO to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Campfire IO vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.8 |
|
Campfire IO vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
Campfire IO vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
Campfire IO vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Campfire IO vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Campfire IO vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Campfire IO vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Campfire IO vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
Campfire IO vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.4 |
|
Campfire IO vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better soundstage, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
E+- Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Soundstage
C-
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details
B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review