Campfire Polaris V1 - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (C Tier | 5.1/10)

Home Campfire Polaris V1

Summary

Based on 2 reviews, the Campfire Polaris V1 is receiving steady, if unspectacular, approval from reviewers, highlighting its dependable nature.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.1

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5.1 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
B- Tech
Comment: For bassheads who do not care about quality. Lovely traditional CA tuning

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C+ Mids: C- Treble: C- Soundstage: B Details: B Imaging: B-

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Pseudo-Japanese tuning focusing on female vocals and a very lively signature.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Campfire Polaris V1 Infos

Discuss Campfire Polaris V1 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Campfire Polaris V1 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Campfire Polaris V1 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Campfire Polaris V1 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Campfire Polaris V1 vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better treble, mids and bass.
8.1
Campfire Polaris V1 vs. Hisenior Mega5-EST
Hisenior Mega5-EST offers better treble, mids and bass.
8
Campfire Polaris V1 vs. Nicehck Rockies
Nicehck Rockies offers better mids, treble and bass.
8
Campfire Polaris V1 vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
8
Campfire Polaris V1 vs. ORIVETI OH700VB
ORIVETI OH700VB offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.9
Campfire Polaris V1 vs. Xenns Top Pro
Xenns Top Pro offers better mids, treble and bass.
7.9
Campfire Polaris V1 vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Thieaudio Oracle MKIII offers better mids, treble and imaging.
7.8
Campfire Polaris V1 vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Night Oblivion Butastur offers better mids, treble and bass.
7.8
Campfire Polaris V1 vs. Intuaura Purple
Similar overall performance.
7.8
Campfire Polaris V1 vs. LetShuoer EJ07M
LetShuoer EJ07M offers better mids, bass and treble.
7.6
Best IEMs from $400 - $600

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Bass C+
It delivers adequate punch and texture, though nothing stands out. Sub-bass presence is hinted rather than delivered.
Mids C-
The mids sound serviceable but rough around the edges, needing polish. Occasional glare can creep into upper mids.
Treble C-
Highs are present enough yet carry a bit of grain and splash. Busy mixes can still feel a bit splashy.
Soundstage B
You can map the ensemble with confidence thanks to solid spacing and coherent depth layering. Ambient effects feel believable.
Details B
Recordings feel well sorted, with supporting details snapping to attention. Small articulations remain intact.
Imaging B-
Complex mixes stay organized thanks to the improved spatial discipline. Complex passages stay intelligible.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer