Dita Project M [5.9/10]

Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for Dita Project M

IEMRanking.com Home Dita Project M
My Ranking My Favorites

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Shuwa-T Gizaudio Axel

Average Reviewer Score:

5.9

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.9

Gaming Grade

B-

Dita Project M Details

Driver Configuration:

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $350

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.7 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A- Tech
Upper midrange detail, treble extension Upper midrange leading to lower treble leans bright, can come across too thin

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: B+ Treble: B+ Soundstage: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 6 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
A- Tech
Impressive bass, airy treble, great resolution. Bright treble, mid-range timbre.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
It's pretty but poorly tuned.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: D Soundstage: B

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Dita Project M Infos

Compare Dita Project M to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Dita Project M vs. Yu9 Que
Yu9 Que offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show Yu9 Que
 8.2
Dita Project M vs. ZiiGaat Luna
ZiiGaat Luna offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show ZiiGaat Luna
 7.9
Dita Project M vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show Dunu Vulkan 2
 7.8
Dita Project M vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
Show Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
 7.7
Dita Project M vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
Show Softears Volume S
 7.7
Dita Project M vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
Show Kiwi Ears Astral
 7.6
Dita Project M vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
Show Epz K9
 7.6
Dita Project M vs. HiSenior Cano Cristales
HiSenior Cano Cristales offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
Show HiSenior Cano Cristales
 7.5
Dita Project M vs. Ziigaat Arcanis
Ziigaat Arcanis offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show Ziigaat Arcanis
 7.5
Dita Project M vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
Show Xenns Tea Pro
 7.5
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer