Dita Project M - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (B Tier | 5.9/10)

Home Dita Project M

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the Dita Project M is receiving steady, if unspectacular, approval from reviewers, highlighting its dependable nature.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.9

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.9

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.7 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A- Tech
Upper midrange detail, treble extension Upper midrange leading to lower treble leans bright, can come across too thin

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: B+ Treble: B+ Soundstage: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 6 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
A- Tech
Impressive bass, airy treble, great resolution. Bright treble, mid-range timbre.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
It's pretty but poorly tuned.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: D Soundstage: B

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Dita Project M Infos

Discuss Dita Project M with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Dita Project M discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Dita Project M to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Dita Project M reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Dita Project M vs. Yu9 Que
Yu9 Que offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
8.1
Dita Project M vs. Hercules Audio Noah
Hercules Audio Noah offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
8.1
Dita Project M vs. Ziigaat Horizon
Ziigaat Horizon offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
7.9
Dita Project M vs. Nice HCK Himalaya
Nice HCK Himalaya offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.8
Dita Project M vs. ZiiGaat Luna
ZiiGaat Luna offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.8
Dita Project M vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
7.8
Dita Project M vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.7
Dita Project M vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
7.7
Dita Project M vs. Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.7
Dita Project M vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
7.7
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Overall technicalities are acceptable, delivering enough clarity for casual sessions. Imaging is serviceable though not immersive.
Bass B
Bass foundation is good, adding satisfying punch without losing control. Pop and rock tracks feel lively.
Mids B-
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble B-
Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.
Dynamics D
Dynamics come across throttled, leaving energetic moments underwhelming. Energetic passages land with a thud.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.
Details A-
Micro-details glide to the forefront effortlessly while timbre remains natural. Ambient cues are vivid and lifelike.
Imaging A-
Spatial cues respond immediately, reflecting every movement in the mix. Spatial cues respond instantly to the mix.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer