EarFun Free Pro 2 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (D Tier | 3.4/10)

Home EarFun Free Pro 2

Summary

Based on 1 review, the EarFun Free Pro 2 is getting lukewarm responses from reviewers, who note that it performs best with tempered expectations.

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

3.4

Very Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.4

Gaming Grade

D

EarFun Free Pro 2 Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $80

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.4 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
D Tech
Spicy treble at ~10kHz lends to timbre issues. Slightly too much 3-5kHz too. Tuning seems decent otherwise, particularly in the bass.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

EarFun Free Pro 2 Infos

Discuss EarFun Free Pro 2 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "EarFun Free Pro 2 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare EarFun Free Pro 2 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough EarFun Free Pro 2 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
EarFun Free Pro 2 vs. ARTTI T10 PRO
ARTTI T10 PRO offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
Show ARTTI T10 PRO
 7.1
EarFun Free Pro 2 vs. GS Audio GD3A
GS Audio GD3A offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
Show GS Audio GD3A
 7
EarFun Free Pro 2 vs. SIMGOT EG280
SIMGOT EG280 offers better imaging, details and dynamics.
Show SIMGOT EG280
 6.6
EarFun Free Pro 2 vs. Rose Technics Star City 5 Pro
Rose Technics Star City 5 Pro offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
Show Rose Technics Star City 5 Pro
 6.5
EarFun Free Pro 2 vs. Moondrop May
Moondrop May offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
Show Moondrop May
 6.5
EarFun Free Pro 2 vs. EarAcoustic STA Pro Max
EarAcoustic STA Pro Max offers better dynamics, imaging and details.
Show EarAcoustic STA Pro Max
 6.5
EarFun Free Pro 2 vs. Kiwi Ears CANTA
Kiwi Ears CANTA offers better treble and dynamics.
Show Kiwi Ears CANTA
 6.5
EarFun Free Pro 2 vs. Simgot EW300
Similar overall performance.
Show Simgot EW300
 6.5
EarFun Free Pro 2 vs. Tanchjim 4U
Similar overall performance.
Show Tanchjim 4U
 6.4
EarFun Free Pro 2 vs. Moondrop Aria 2
Moondrop Aria 2 offers better details, mids and imaging.
Show Moondrop Aria 2
 6.2
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Bass C+
Bass performance is average—present enough but rarely inspiring. It neither offends nor impresses.
Mids C-
The region is listenable but lacks the finesse and clarity of better tuning. A touch of EQ can smooth things out.
Treble C-
Expect serviceable treble that keeps detail audible without much polish. It keeps the highs audible without elegance.
Dynamics D
Dynamics come across throttled, leaving energetic moments underwhelming. Energetic passages land with a thud.
Details D
It can follow the main lines but loses composure once arrangements become busy. Fine articulation is frequently glossed over.
Imaging D
Panning effects blur at the edges, making movement sound smeared. Fast panning effects smear noticeably.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer