EPZ Q5 - Reviews & Ratings

4 Reviews (B Tier | 5.7/10)

Home EPZ Q5

Summary

Based on 4 reviews, the EPZ Q5 is a sensible option among reviewers, especially for listeners seeking balance without drama.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.7

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.2

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7 * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
Can be a bit bright on pop/edm, but very good for jazz/blues/soul and warm instrumentals.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Nice Bass response, great graph, overall clean set.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: B

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.3 * score rescaled + normalized
6 community members have rated the EPZ Q5 at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

EPZ Q5 Infos

Discuss EPZ Q5 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "EPZ Q5 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare EPZ Q5 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough EPZ Q5 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
EPZ Q5 vs. KZ Zenith
KZ Zenith offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6.8
EPZ Q5 vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
6.5
EPZ Q5 vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better dynamics.
6.4
EPZ Q5 vs. Apos x Community Rock Lobster
Apos x Community Rock Lobster offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6.3
EPZ Q5 vs. 7hz Sonus
Similar overall performance.
6.3
EPZ Q5 vs. Kbear KB02
Kbear KB02 offers better dynamics.
6.3
EPZ Q5 vs. Kefine Delci
Kefine Delci offers better dynamics.
6.2
EPZ Q5 vs. Moondrop Lan 2 Pop
Moondrop Lan 2 Pop offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
6.2
EPZ Q5 vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
6.2
EPZ Q5 vs. HZSound Heart Mirror Zero
Similar overall performance.
6.2
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Mids C+
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble C-
Expect serviceable treble that keeps detail audible without much polish. It keeps the highs audible without elegance.
Dynamics E+
Dynamic range feels limited, smearing micro-contrast and transient attack. Soft details are smoothed into the background.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer