EPZ Q5 [5.5/10]
Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for EPZ Q5
IEMRanking.com
Home
EPZ Q5
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.5Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.2Gaming Grade
C+EPZ Q5 Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $50
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
7
* score normalized
5
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
B
Tech
Can be a bit bright on pop/edm, but very good for jazz/blues/soul and warm instrumentals. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
4.5
Reviewer Score
C
Tuning
C-
Tech
Nice Bass response, great graph, overall clean set. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: C-
Dynamics: E+
Soundstage: B
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
EPZ Q5 Infos
Compare EPZ Q5 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
EPZ Q5 vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
|
6.5 |
|
EPZ Q5 vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better dynamics.
|
6.4 |
|
EPZ Q5 vs. 7hz Sonus
Similar overall performance.
|
6.2 |
|
EPZ Q5 vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
|
6 |
|
EPZ Q5 vs. Kefine Delci
Kefine Delci offers better dynamics.
|
6 |
|
EPZ Q5 vs. Intime Sora Light
Intime Sora Light offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6 |
|
EPZ Q5 vs. TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red
TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
5.9 |
|
EPZ Q5 vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics and treble.
|
5.8 |
|
EPZ Q5 vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
5.7 |
|
EPZ Q5 vs. CCA Rhapsody
Similar overall performance.
|
5.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B-- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review