EPZ Q5 Pro V2 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (B Tier | 5.5/10)

IEMRanking.com Home EPZ Q5 Pro V2

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.9

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Bright for me.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

EPZ Q5 Pro V2 Infos

Compare EPZ Q5 Pro V2 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
EPZ Q5 Pro V2 vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
6.5
EPZ Q5 Pro V2 vs. Moondrop May
Moondrop May offers better mids and soundstage.
6.5
EPZ Q5 Pro V2 vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better soundstage.
6.4
EPZ Q5 Pro V2 vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better soundstage.
6.2
EPZ Q5 Pro V2 vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better soundstage and dynamics.
6
EPZ Q5 Pro V2 vs. Kefine Delci
Kefine Delci offers better soundstage.
6
EPZ Q5 Pro V2 vs. Intime Sora Light
Intime Sora Light offers better soundstage and mids.
6
EPZ Q5 Pro V2 vs. TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red
TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
5.9
EPZ Q5 Pro V2 vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better soundstage and mids.
5.7
EPZ Q5 Pro V2 vs. Truthear Zero: Blue 2
Truthear Zero: Blue 2 offers better mids and soundstage.
5.7
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer