Etymotic ER4XR [6.5/10]
Reviews (4), scores and comparisons for Etymotic ER4XR
IEMRanking.com
Home
Etymotic ER4XR
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.5Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.2Gaming Grade
BEtymotic ER4XR Details
Driver Configuration: 1BA
Tuning Type: Neutral
Brand: Etymotic Top Etymotic IEMs
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
8*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Crin
7
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
A-
Tech
Reviewed by: Audionotions
5.5
Reviewer Score
Three words. Detail. Boring. Intrusive. Previously Owned
Reviewed by: Precogvision
5.3
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
C+
Tech
So. Darn. Boring. But yes, it's the BA benchmark.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: A-
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C+
Details: B
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Etymotic ER4XR Infos
Compare Etymotic ER4XR to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Etymotic ER4XR vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better bass, imaging and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
Etymotic ER4XR vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better bass, treble and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
Etymotic ER4XR vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better bass, dynamics and imaging.
|
7.6 |
|
Etymotic ER4XR vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better imaging, bass and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
Etymotic ER4XR vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better bass, dynamics and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
Etymotic ER4XR vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
|
7.2 |
|
Etymotic ER4XR vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
7 |
|
Etymotic ER4XR vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
|
Etymotic ER4XR vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better bass and treble.
|
7 |
|
Etymotic ER4XR vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better bass, treble and dynamics.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Details
B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review