Fatfreq Reference - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 4.5/10)

Home Fatfreq Reference

Summary

Based on 1 review, the Fatfreq Reference is drawing mixed impressions from reviewers, with opinions often splitting along personal preferences.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.8

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C Tech

Fatfreq Reference Infos

Discuss Fatfreq Reference with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Fatfreq Reference discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Fatfreq Reference to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Fatfreq Reference reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Fatfreq Reference vs. Letshuoer S12 Ultra
Similar overall performance.
7.6
Fatfreq Reference vs. 7hz x Crinacle Divine
Similar overall performance.
7.4
Fatfreq Reference vs. Dunu Kima 2
Similar overall performance.
7.4
Fatfreq Reference vs. Crinear Daybreak
Similar overall performance.
7.3
Fatfreq Reference vs. CCA HYDRO
Similar overall performance.
7.3
Fatfreq Reference vs. Aful Explorer
Similar overall performance.
7.3
Fatfreq Reference vs. HIDIZS MP143
Similar overall performance.
7.2
Fatfreq Reference vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Similar overall performance.
7.1
Fatfreq Reference vs. Myer Audio CKLVX D41
Similar overall performance.
7.1
Fatfreq Reference vs. Tanchjim Fission
Similar overall performance.
7.1
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer