Fearless S5H - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (B Tier | 5.5/10)

IEMRanking.com Home Fearless S5H

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 5.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B- Tech
Similar if not identical to the S4, though with a little less upper mids.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Fearless S5H Infos

Compare Fearless S5H to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Fearless S5H vs. ZiiGaat Luna
Similar overall performance.
7.9
Fearless S5H vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Similar overall performance.
7.8
Fearless S5H vs. Softears Volume S
Similar overall performance.
7.7
Fearless S5H vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Similar overall performance.
7.6
Fearless S5H vs. Epz K9
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Fearless S5H vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Fearless S5H vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Fearless S5H vs. Yanyin Canon II
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Fearless S5H vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Fearless S5H vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Similar overall performance.
7.4
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer