Fearless S8Z [5.8/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for Fearless S8Z

IEMRanking.com Home Fearless S8Z

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Crin 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B+ Tech
Solid all-rounder with a safe, pleasing tuning.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin
Precogvision 5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
A more aggressive S8P with even more grit/BA artifacting in the treble.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Details: B Imaging: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Fearless S8Z Infos

Compare Fearless S8Z to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Fearless S8Z vs. Softears RSV MK II
Offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
8.3
Fearless S8Z vs. NiceHCK Rockies
Offers better treble, mids and bass.
8.1
Fearless S8Z vs. Hisenior Mega5-EST
Offers better treble, bass and mids.
7.9
Fearless S8Z vs. Xenns Top Pro
Offers better treble, imaging and mids.
7.9
Fearless S8Z vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Offers better treble, mids and imaging.
7.7
Fearless S8Z vs. EPZ 530
Offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
7.7
Fearless S8Z vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Offers better treble, imaging and bass.
7.6
Fearless S8Z vs. Moondrop S8
Offers better treble, imaging and mids.
7.6
Fearless S8Z vs. Moondrop Variations
Offers better treble, bass and mids.
7.5
Fearless S8Z vs. Sennheiser IE600
Offers better treble, bass and mids.
7.5
Best IEMs from $400 - $600

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer