IEMRanking.com
Home
Fearless S8Z
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.8Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.5Gaming Grade
B-Fearless S8Z Details
Driver Configuration: 8BA
Tuning Type: Warm neutral
Price (Msrp): $589
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Solid all-rounder with a safe, pleasing tuning. Crin Youtube Channel
A more aggressive S8P with even more grit/BA artifacting in the treble. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C+
Details: B
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Fearless S8Z Infos
Compare Fearless S8Z to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Fearless S8Z vs. Softears RSV MK II
Offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
8.3 |
Fearless S8Z vs. NiceHCK Rockies
Offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
8.1 |
Fearless S8Z vs. Hisenior Mega5-EST
Offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7.9 |
Fearless S8Z vs. Xenns Top Pro
Offers better treble, imaging and mids.
|
7.9 |
Fearless S8Z vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Offers better treble, mids and imaging.
|
7.7 |
Fearless S8Z vs. EPZ 530
Offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
7.7 |
Fearless S8Z vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Offers better treble, imaging and bass.
|
7.6 |
Fearless S8Z vs. Moondrop S8
Offers better treble, imaging and mids.
|
7.6 |
Fearless S8Z vs. Moondrop Variations
Offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7.5 |
Fearless S8Z vs. Sennheiser IE600
Offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Details
B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review