Fender FXA2 - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (C Tier | 4/10)
Home
Fender FXA2
Summary
Based on 1 review, the Fender FXA2 is earning praise from some reviewers while others stay unconvinced, resulting in a balanced verdict.
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.1Gaming Grade
C-Fender FXA2 Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $270
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
4
Reviewer Score
D+
Tuning
C-
Tech
Riddled with technical limitations and somewhat poor timbre
Bass: C-
Mids: C-
Treble: D+
Soundstage: C-
Details: C
Imaging: C-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Fender FXA2 Infos
Compare Fender FXA2 to popular alternatives
Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Fender FXA2 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Fender FXA2 vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better bass, treble and soundstage.
|
7.8 |
|
Fender FXA2 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7.8 |
|
Fender FXA2 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, soundstage and mids.
|
7.7 |
|
Fender FXA2 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.7 |
|
Fender FXA2 vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better bass, soundstage and imaging.
|
7.7 |
|
Fender FXA2 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better bass, soundstage and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
Fender FXA2 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better bass, soundstage and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Fender FXA2 vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better bass, treble and imaging.
|
7.5 |
|
Fender FXA2 vs. INTUAURA Balance
INTUAURA Balance offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
7.4 |
|
Fender FXA2 vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D+- Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass
C-
It keeps the low end tidy, though energy and weight remain limited. It favors balance over excitement.
Mids
C-
The mids sound serviceable but rough around the edges, needing polish. Occasional glare can creep into upper mids.
Treble
D+
Highs feel erratic, with dips and spikes that make the signature unpredictable. It alternates between splashy and dull.
Soundstage
C-
It creates a serviceable arc that keeps instruments apart but rarely draws you into the space. It sounds more intimate than expansive.
Details
C
It conveys the core of each track yet glosses over the quieter gestures underneath. Delicate details remain a bit subdued.
Imaging
C-
Center information lands in the right area but not with laser focus. Separation is adequate for casual listening.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review