Fiio FH3 [5.2/10]

Reviews (6), scores and comparisons for Fiio FH3

IEMRanking.com Home Fiio FH3

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz Precogvision
Shuwa-T Crin
Jaytiss
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

5.2

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.3

Gaming Grade

C-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 8.5* * score normalized

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
Bass, but at what cost? Everything.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: C+

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5.1 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
B- Tech
Comment: Bass boosted neutral tuning. Narrow soundstage

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B- Mids: C- Treble: C Soundstage: C+ Details: B Imaging: B-

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B- Tech
Does come off as sort of a broken FH5, but the FH5 elements are mostly there.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 3.5 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
D Tech
My first IEM. Bad coherency and timbre. Good techs, bad tuning for my library. IMO, there are better and cheaper options out there.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C+ Mids: D Treble: D Details: D Imaging: C-

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Bloated bass and general congestion issues.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Fiio FH3 Infos

Compare Fiio FH3 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Fiio FH3 vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better treble, mids and details.
7.1
Fiio FH3 vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7
Fiio FH3 vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7
Fiio FH3 vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
6.9
Fiio FH3 vs. Truthear Nova
Truthear Nova offers better treble, mids and details.
6.7
Fiio FH3 vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
6.7
Fiio FH3 vs. Kiwi Ears ETUDE
Kiwi Ears ETUDE offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
6.6
Fiio FH3 vs. Shozy P20
Shozy P20 offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
6.6
Fiio FH3 vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better soundstage, mids and treble.
6.6
Fiio FH3 vs. Simgot EM6L
Simgot EM6L offers better mids, treble and details.
6.5
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble D+
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer