Fiio FH5 - Reviews & Ratings

5 Reviews (B Tier | 5.8/10)

Home Fiio FH5

Summary

Based on 5 reviews, the Fiio FH5 is receiving steady, if unspectacular, approval from reviewers, highlighting its dependable nature.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.2

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Stellar bass response and decent technical ability, not much to fault.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5.2 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Clarity improvement over the FH3

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Soundstage: B- Details: B- Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Easily the best Fiio IEM. Warm, pleasant tuning with decent detail.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 4.7 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C Tech
Discontinued. Stellar bass response. Treble and timbre are a bit off, but still a solid offer and not much else to complain about. Detail is enough to keep up with the tunning.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: B Mids: C- Treble: C- Details: C Imaging: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Fiio FH5 Infos

Discuss Fiio FH5 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Fiio FH5 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Fiio FH5 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Fiio FH5 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, imaging and details.
7.7
Fiio FH5 vs. Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua offers better details, imaging and treble.
7.7
Fiio FH5 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and bass.
7.7
Fiio FH5 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better mids, treble and bass.
7.7
Fiio FH5 vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better details, bass and mids.
7.7
Fiio FH5 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and imaging.
7.7
Fiio FH5 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better details, mids and treble.
7.5
Fiio FH5 vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
7.4
Fiio FH5 vs. INTUAURA Balance
INTUAURA Balance offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.4
Fiio FH5 vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 4
Letshuoer Cadenza 4 offers better mids, treble and details.
7.4
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass B-
Low-end delivery feels competent yet unremarkable, keeping a safe profile. Low-end bloom is kept in check.
Mids C
Expect adequate midrange presence with a touch of grit and unevenness. Textures smear when the mix gets busy.
Treble C
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Soundstage B-
It pushes sound outward confidently while leaving height development as an unfinished idea. Height remains subtle but detectable.
Details C+
It rides the line between musicality and analysis, occasionally letting micro-detail slip by. Complex mixes stay organized for the most part.
Imaging C+
Complex mixes stay organized thanks to the improved spatial discipline. Complex passages stay intelligible.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer