Fiio FP3 [3.7/10]

Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for Fiio FP3

IEMRanking.com Home Fiio FP3

Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews
Gizaudio Axel
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

3.7

Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.4

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Jaytiss 5.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Can be a fun specialist

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C- Soundstage: B
Gizaudio Axel 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel
Z-Reviews 1 * score normalized

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Fiio FP3 Infos

Compare Fiio FP3 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Fiio FP3 vs. Kiwi Ears CANTA
Kiwi Ears CANTA offers better treble and dynamics.
6.5
Fiio FP3 vs. Moondrop May
Moondrop May offers better mids and dynamics.
6.5
Fiio FP3 vs. Tanchjim 4U
Similar overall performance.
6.4
Fiio FP3 vs. Simgot EW300
Similar overall performance.
6.3
Fiio FP3 vs. Simgot EA500LM
Simgot EA500LM offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
6.3
Fiio FP3 vs. Moondrop Aria 2
Moondrop Aria 2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
6.2
Fiio FP3 vs. Pula Unicrom
Pula Unicrom offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
6.1
Fiio FP3 vs. Truthear Pure
Truthear Pure offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
6.1
Fiio FP3 vs. Truthear Hexa
Truthear Hexa offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
6.1
Fiio FP3 vs. EPZ X Tipsy Star One
Similar overall performance.
6
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer