Final Audio B2 - Reviews & Ratings
2 Reviews (C Tier | 5.4/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
Final Audio B2
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.4Mixed to Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.5Gaming Grade
B-Final Audio B2 Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: Neutral
Brand: Final Audio Top Final Audio IEMs
Price (Msrp): $300
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
5.8
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
B
Tech
Comment: The entry tier of the B series from Final.
Decent tuning
Blunted notes, somewhat mediocre technical performance
Bass: B-
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Soundstage: B+
Details: B
Imaging: B+
Reviewed by: Crin
5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Fairly normal "single BA tuning", but severely lacking in upper treble extension.
Crin Youtube Channel
Crin Youtube Channel
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Final Audio B2 Infos
Compare Final Audio B2 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Final Audio B2 vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.8 |
|
Final Audio B2 vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
Final Audio B2 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
Final Audio B2 vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Final Audio B2 vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
Final Audio B2 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Final Audio B2 vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Final Audio B2 vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
Final Audio B2 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.4 |
|
Final Audio B2 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Soundstage
B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging
B+
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming
B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review