Fir Audio KR5 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (B Tier | 6.9/10)

Home Sort best dynamics Fir Audio KR5

Summary

Based on 1 review, the Fir Audio KR5 is a good all-rounder according to reviewers, with strengths that appeal to a wide audience.

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

6.9

Cautiously Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.6

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.9 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A Tech
Comment: Silver model tested. W-shaped tuning with excellent clarity; detail-focused iem Midbass hump can interfere with the midrange on crowded tracks

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A- Mids: B Treble: B Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Fir Audio KR5 Infos

Compare Fir Audio KR5 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Fir Audio KR5 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Fir Audio KR5 vs. Softears Enigma
Softears Enigma offers better treble, mids and bass.
9
Fir Audio KR5 vs. Elysian Annihilator 2023
Elysian Annihilator 2023 offers better treble, mids and details.
9
Fir Audio KR5 vs. Fort Ears Mefisto
Fort Ears Mefisto offers better mids, treble and imaging.
9
Fir Audio KR5 vs. Thieaudio Valhalla
Thieaudio Valhalla offers better mids, treble and imaging.
8.9
Fir Audio KR5 vs. Elysian Annihilator 2021
Elysian Annihilator 2021 offers better treble, mids and details.
8.9
Fir Audio KR5 vs. Elysian Apostle
Elysian Apostle offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
8.8
Fir Audio KR5 vs. 7th Acoustics Asteria
7th Acoustics Asteria offers better mids, treble and bass.
8.8
Fir Audio KR5 vs. Canpur CP622B
Canpur CP622B offers better mids, treble and imaging.
8.7
Fir Audio KR5 vs. Empire Ears Raven
Empire Ears Raven offers better mids, imaging and bass.
8.6
Fir Audio KR5 vs. FATFreq Grand Maestro
FATFreq Grand Maestro offers better treble, soundstage and mids.
8.6
Best IEMs from $2,000 - $4,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Overall technical control is strong, presenting instruments with clarity and sensible staging. Textures are portrayed with satisfying clarity.
Bass A-
Expect a commanding bass response that reaches deep without clouding the mix. There's both slam and nuance in equal measure.
Mids B
The mids are articulate and well-balanced, lending body to instruments. Instrument layering remains stable.
Treble B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Soundstage A
You hear both the breadth and the altitude of the mix, anchored by accurate positional cues. Immersion improves across genres.
Details A+
The tiniest inflections pop into view as if spotlit within the mix. Low-level details feel magnified yet natural.
Imaging A-
Each element locks into a steady coordinate even as the mix grows dense. Imaging holds even during busy segments.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer