GS Audio GT12X - Reviews & Ratings
2 Reviews (E Tier | 2.3/10)
Home
GS Audio GT12X
Summary
Based on 2 reviews, the GS Audio GT12X is leaving reviewers searching for better alternatives because it rarely distinguishes itself.
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
2.3Very Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
1Gaming Grade
E-GS Audio GT12X Details
Driver Configuration: 12BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $250
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Nymz
1
Reviewer Score
E-
Tuning
E-
Tech
Tuning bottleneck. Techs not the worst but impossible to come alive with this tuning....
Bass: E-
Mids: E-
Treble: E-
Details: E-
Imaging: E-
Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org
3.5
* score rescaled + normalized
One community member has rated the GS Audio GT12X at an average of 2.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Unfavorable.
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
GS Audio GT12X Infos
Compare GS Audio GT12X to popular alternatives
Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough GS Audio GT12X reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
GS Audio GT12X vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better bass, mids and imaging.
|
7.8 |
|
GS Audio GT12X vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
GS Audio GT12X vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, details and mids.
|
7.7 |
|
GS Audio GT12X vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better bass, details and imaging.
|
7.7 |
|
GS Audio GT12X vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
GS Audio GT12X vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better bass, details and imaging.
|
7.5 |
|
GS Audio GT12X vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better bass, details and imaging.
|
7.5 |
|
GS Audio GT12X vs. INTUAURA Balance
INTUAURA Balance offers better mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
GS Audio GT12X vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
|
7.4 |
|
GS Audio GT12X vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 4
Letshuoer Cadenza 4 offers better mids, details and imaging.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
E-- The tonal profile is unruly and tiring, forcing constant volume adjustments. Even spoken word sounds unnatural.
Average Technical Grade
E-- Everything sounds flat and suffocated, with even elementary passages losing definition and energy. Expect little in the way of micro-details.
Bass
E-
Low-end energy stays weak, offering little support or presence. Electronic tracks feel especially empty.
Mids
E-
Midrange sits extremely recessed, burying vocals under a muddy veil. Lead vocals hide far behind the mix.
Treble
E-
Treble is heavily rolled off, muting sparkle and detail. Detail retrieval in highs is nonexistent.
Details
E-
Micro information is stripped away, reducing recordings to hollow outlines and blurred shapes. Quiet nuances evaporate instantly.
Imaging
E-
It mimics a blurry mono feed with barely any spatial intent. It feels like mono with a hint of blur.
Gaming
E-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review