iBasso IT01X [4.6/10]
Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for iBasso IT01X
IEMRanking.com
Home
iBasso IT01X
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.6Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.9Gaming Grade
D+iBasso IT01X Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: V-shape
Price (Msrp): $120
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Crin
4.5
Reviewer Score
C
Tuning
C
Tech
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3.3
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
D
Tech
Warm sound signature that could use some work in the technical department.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: C-
Treble: C-
Dynamics: D
Details: D
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
iBasso IT01X Infos
Compare iBasso IT01X to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
iBasso IT01X vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.1 |
|
iBasso IT01X vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7 |
|
iBasso IT01X vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7 |
|
iBasso IT01X vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6.9 |
|
iBasso IT01X vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
|
6.7 |
|
iBasso IT01X vs. Kiwi Ears ETUDE
Kiwi Ears ETUDE offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6.6 |
|
iBasso IT01X vs. JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant
JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant offers better mids, details and imaging.
|
6.6 |
|
iBasso IT01X vs. Shozy P20
Shozy P20 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6.6 |
|
iBasso IT01X vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better dynamics and mids.
|
6.6 |
|
iBasso IT01X vs. Simgot EM6L
Simgot EM6L offers better details, imaging and bass.
|
6.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D+- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details
D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming
D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review