Ikko Gems OH1S [4.9/10]
Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for Ikko Gems OH1S
IEMRanking.com
Home
Ikko Gems OH1S
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.9Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.3Gaming Grade
DIkko Gems OH1S Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+1BA
Tuning Type: Bright neutral
Brand: Ikko Top Ikko IEMs
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Z-Reviews
8
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Super* Review
4*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Precogvision
2.6
Reviewer Score
E+
Tuning
D+
Tech
A major regression from the OH10. Zero bass with a thin, fatiguing midrange and treble response.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: E+
Treble: E+
Dynamics: D
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Ikko Gems OH1S Infos
Compare Ikko Gems OH1S to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Ikko Gems OH1S vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.7 |
|
Ikko Gems OH1S vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.6 |
|
Ikko Gems OH1S vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
Ikko Gems OH1S vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
Ikko Gems OH1S vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
|
7.3 |
|
Ikko Gems OH1S vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7.2 |
|
Ikko Gems OH1S vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7 |
|
Ikko Gems OH1S vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
|
Ikko Gems OH1S vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7 |
|
Ikko Gems OH1S vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
E+- Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.
Average Technical Grade
D+- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
E+
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details
C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming
D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review