IKKO OH10 Modified [6.3/10]
Reviews (1), scores and comparisons for IKKO OH10 Modified
IEMRanking.com
Home
IKKO OH10 Modified
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.3Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.4Gaming Grade
C-IKKO OH10 Modified Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: Ikko Top Ikko IEMs
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
6.3
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C-
Tech
Very enjoyable bass, reasonable iem, nice, but not overly impressive.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: C-
Dynamics: B
Soundstage: A-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
IKKO OH10 Modified Infos
Compare IKKO OH10 Modified to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
IKKO OH10 Modified vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.7 |
|
IKKO OH10 Modified vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
IKKO OH10 Modified vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
IKKO OH10 Modified vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
IKKO OH10 Modified vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
7.3 |
|
IKKO OH10 Modified vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids and treble.
|
7.2 |
|
IKKO OH10 Modified vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better treble and mids.
|
7 |
|
IKKO OH10 Modified vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
|
IKKO OH10 Modified vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better treble and mids.
|
7 |
|
IKKO OH10 Modified vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better treble and mids.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage
A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review