inTime Miyabi Mk2 - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (A Tier | 7/10)

Home inTime Miyabi Mk2

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the inTime Miyabi Mk2 is standing out as a favorite among reviewers, who note that it elevates everyday playlists.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7

Generally Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.8

Gaming Grade

B+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B+ Tech
One of the best tuned bullet style IEMs, bass response and treble extension Treble can come across piercing (cymbals harmonics)

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A- Mids: B Treble: A Soundstage: A- Details: A- Imaging: B+

Reviewed by: Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 6.7 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: B+ Dynamics: A- Details: B+ Imaging: B+

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.5 * score rescaled + normalized
One community member has rated the intime Miyabi MkII at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

inTime Miyabi Mk2 Infos

Discuss inTime Miyabi Mk2 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "inTime Miyabi Mk2 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare inTime Miyabi Mk2 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough inTime Miyabi Mk2 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, bass and soundstage.
7.7
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, imaging and bass.
7.7
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better imaging, details and bass.
7.5
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, imaging and bass.
7.5
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
7.4
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 4
Letshuoer Cadenza 4 offers better mids, imaging and details.
7.4
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
Similar overall performance.
7.4
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics.
7.4
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Crinear Meta
Crinear Meta offers better mids, treble and imaging.
7.3
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Hidizs MP145
Hidizs MP145 offers better details, dynamics and bass.
7.3
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Overall technicalities are acceptable, delivering enough clarity for casual sessions. Imaging is serviceable though not immersive.
Bass A-
It serves up confident rumble and texture while keeping the spectrum balanced. You can enjoy bass-heavy music without fatigue.
Mids B+
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble A-
Treble performance is excellent—airy, extended, and beautifully controlled. It reveals subtle studio ambiance.
Dynamics A-
Dynamic performance is excellent, combining sharp transients with strong contrast. Transients snap with authority.
Soundstage A-
You hear both the breadth and the altitude of the mix, anchored by accurate positional cues. Immersion improves across genres.
Details B+
Recordings feel well sorted, with supporting details snapping to attention. Small articulations remain intact.
Imaging B+
Depth cues step forward, giving performances a dimensional presence. Front-to-back cues become more immersive.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer