IEMRanking.com
Home
inTime Miyabi Mk2
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.8Cautiously Favorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.8Gaming Grade
B+inTime Miyabi Mk2 Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+1PZE
Tuning Type: bass-boosted neutral
Price (Msrp): $230
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
One of the best tuned bullet style IEMs, bass response and treble extension
Treble can come across piercing (cymbals harmonics)
Bass: A-
Mids: B
Treble: A
Soundstage: A-
Details: A-
Imaging: B+
Reviewed by: Smirk Audio
check links for more info:
Bass: A-
Mids: A-
Treble: B+
Dynamics: A-
Details: B+
Imaging: B+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
inTime Miyabi Mk2 Infos
Compare inTime Miyabi Mk2 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, imaging and bass.
|
7.7 |
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7.6 |
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, imaging and bass.
|
7.6 |
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics.
|
7.4 |
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better mids, treble and imaging.
|
7.3 |
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better bass, imaging and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Similar overall performance.
|
7.3 |
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids.
|
7.2 |
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey 2
Ziigaat Odyssey 2 offers better mids, bass and imaging.
|
7.1 |
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
Similar overall performance.
|
7.1 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids
B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble
A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics
A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage
A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details
B+
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging
B+
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming
B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review