inTime Miyabi Mk2 [6.8/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for inTime Miyabi Mk2

IEMRanking.com Home inTime Miyabi Mk2

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T Smirk Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

6.8

Cautiously Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.8

Gaming Grade

B+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B+ Tech
One of the best tuned bullet style IEMs, bass response and treble extension Treble can come across piercing (cymbals harmonics)

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A- Mids: B Treble: A Soundstage: A- Details: A- Imaging: B+

Reviewed by: Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 6.7 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: B+ Dynamics: A- Details: B+ Imaging: B+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

inTime Miyabi Mk2 Infos

Compare inTime Miyabi Mk2 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, imaging and bass.
7.7
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, bass and treble.
7.6
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, imaging and bass.
7.6
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics.
7.4
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better mids, treble and imaging.
7.3
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better bass, imaging and dynamics.
7.3
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Similar overall performance.
7.3
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids.
7.2
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey 2
Ziigaat Odyssey 2 offers better mids, bass and imaging.
7.1
inTime Miyabi Mk2 vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
Similar overall performance.
7.1
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details B+
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B+
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer