IEMRanking.com
Home
Juzear 41T
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.1Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.9Gaming Grade
CJuzear 41T Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+4BA
Tuning Type: Neutral
Brand: Juzear Top Juzear IEMs
Price (Msrp): $160
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
This is a colored sound, I don't like it but I can see how others might.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B
Treble: C+
Dynamics: D
Soundstage: C+
Reviewed by: Nymz
check links for more info:
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Juzear 41T Infos
Compare Juzear 41T to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Juzear 41T vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.3 |
Juzear 41T vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better treble, soundstage and dynamics.
|
7 |
Juzear 41T vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7 |
Juzear 41T vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better bass, soundstage and dynamics.
|
7 |
Juzear 41T vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better soundstage, dynamics and mids.
|
6.9 |
Juzear 41T vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
|
6.9 |
Juzear 41T vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
|
6.9 |
Juzear 41T vs. Ziigaat Lush
Ziigaat Lush offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
|
6.8 |
Juzear 41T vs. Truthear Nova
Truthear Nova offers better dynamics, details and bass.
|
6.7 |
Juzear 41T vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better dynamics, bass and soundstage.
|
6.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage
C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review