Juzear 41T - Reviews & Ratings

4 Reviews (B Tier | 6.5/10)

Home Juzear 41T

Summary

Based on 4 reviews, the Juzear 41T is a positive pick among reviewers, who feel it delivers a well-rounded experience.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.5

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.9

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Juzear 41T or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $163.99

Buy Juzear 41T on HiFiGO

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C+ Tech
This is a colored sound, I don't like it but I can see how others might.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: D Soundstage: C+

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
check links for more info:

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.5 * score rescaled + normalized
One community member has rated the JUZEAR 41T at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Juzear 41T Infos

Discuss Juzear 41T with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Juzear 41T discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Juzear 41T to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Juzear 41T reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Juzear 41T vs. Letshuoer S12 Ultra
Letshuoer S12 Ultra offers better dynamics, details and bass.
7.6
Juzear 41T vs. Crinear Daybreak
Crinear Daybreak offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
7.3
Juzear 41T vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better soundstage, dynamics and mids.
7.3
Juzear 41T vs. HIDIZS MP143
HIDIZS MP143 offers better soundstage and dynamics.
7.2
Juzear 41T vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better dynamics, soundstage and imaging.
7.2
Juzear 41T vs. Myer Audio CKLVX D41
Myer Audio CKLVX D41 offers better details, imaging and bass.
7.1
Juzear 41T vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better dynamics, soundstage and treble.
7.1
Juzear 41T vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
7
Juzear 41T vs. Myer Audio CKLVX CK2V
Similar overall performance.
7
Juzear 41T vs. Moondrop Kadenz
Moondrop Kadenz offers better treble, dynamics and bass.
6.9
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass C+
Bass performance is average—present enough but rarely inspiring. It neither offends nor impresses.
Mids B-
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C+
The top end is tidy and serviceable, adding air without overdoing it. Extension is decent for casual listening.
Dynamics D
Volume shifts feel constrained, so build-ups plateau before releasing. Build-ups plateau before resolving.
Soundstage C+
You start to perceive distinct rows of players even if the ceiling still feels low. Layering is present but still modest.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval that handles most textures while leaving some micro-information understated. Most textures come through cleanly.
Imaging C+
The stage feels orderly, guiding your ear across positions without confusion. Depth layering is hinted and believable.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Buy

Footer