Juzear 81T [6.7/10]
Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for Juzear 81T
IEMRanking.com
Home
Juzear 81T
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.7Cautiously Favorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.5Gaming Grade
B+Juzear 81T Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+8BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: Juzear Top Juzear IEMs
Price (Msrp): $249
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
A
Tuning
A+
Tech
Clean balanced sound with good punch low-end, but... Harman 2019, just get Supermix 4 or Nova.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
6.3
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Strong V, but good drivers if you want a V signature.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C+
Soundstage: A-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Juzear 81T Infos
Compare Juzear 81T to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Juzear 81T vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.7 |
|
Juzear 81T vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
Juzear 81T vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
Juzear 81T vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
Juzear 81T vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Juzear 81T vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
Juzear 81T vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
Juzear 81T vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
Juzear 81T vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.3 |
|
Juzear 81T vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
7.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage
A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming
B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review